Answer:
B. No fallacy
Explanation:
First of, we need to know what a fallacy is. A fallacy is a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound arguments.
A sound argument is an argument in which the truth in the premises are used to deduce the conclusions. While an unsound argument, makes use of premises that are not true.
With these, we can determine if the argument in the question was a sound argument. If it was, it won't be fallacious.
There is truth in the fact that the slim tea made Barbara loose 15 pounds after taking it for the stated period of time.
Therefore, concluding that someone with the same buildup as Barbara will have the same results, after taking the tea for the same period of time, is logical and not fallacious. This is because the premise is a true fact that has been tested, and the conclusion was drawn from the true premise.
This makes the argument a sound argument, with no fallacy
If an upward curve should shift left it shows that a fall or decrease has happened.
Lets say assume the demand curve shifts to the left. The demand curve is a curve that shows us the graphical relationship between price and quantity.
If the curve shifts to the left, it shows that there is a fall in the quantity demanded of goods. It means that the price of the product has increased and the consumers have reduced their demand of the good.
Read more on brainly.com/question/13540195?referrer=searchResults
It is because he multiplied the denominators incorrectly
Juan calculates the volume of a rectangular prism with dimensions of three by four feet by five feet by one half feet.
This is how he worked it out:
V = L.W.H
V = (3/4)(5/1)(1/2) = ((3)(5)(1)) / ((4)(1)(2)) = 15/6 = 2.5
Solving the Question:
Volume is calculated by:
V = L*W*H
where
Length is 3/4 ft
Width is 5/1 ft
Height is 1/2 ft
Hence find the volume:
Juan's product of the denominators was 6 but the correct answer is 8, so his answer was wrong.
please click the link below to find out more on this calculation
brainly.com/question/16867203
#SPJ4
Returns on investments, not wages
Option B
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
From the above statement it is observed that the individual Nathan is stated to be upper-class man who owns a mansion and other amenities and get pleasure from them.
The Nathan’s earnings had put him in this position to have a wealthy lifestyle. Actually he might have invested his income in the good ROI, which is stated has good return on investment.
He has made the right decisions at the right times that his fortunes have not declined and maintained the wealthy lifestyle by investing in the return on investment.
