Answer:
Common stock dividend distributable = Par * Number of shares * % dividend
= 13 * 46,500 * 15%
= $90,675
Stock Dividend = Number of shares * market price * % dividend
= 46,500 * 18 * 15%
= $125,550
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec, 1 Stock Dividend $125,550
Common Stock Dividend Distributable $90,675
Paid in Capital in excess of Par- $34,875
Common stock
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec, 31 Common Stock Dividend Distributable $90,675
Common Stock $90,675
Answer:
The answer is stated below:
Explanation:
If the SEC and the AICPA, worked altogether in order to share the information, they might have detected the fraud prior. The case states that the Madoff Securities does not required to submit the peer review program to AICPA as Friehling, had recorded that he did not perform or conduct any audits.
Recommendation
1. The policy execution for the exchange of the information among the two firms would be useful to detect the fraud.
2. The PCAOB should spend more resources an attending the hotline of whistle blowing through executing the policies which need certain complaints to be addressed effectively.
3. The firms or company should have done more in order to verify the financial statements assertions, which surrounds the investments. The PCAOB need to execute the policy that require the companies (such as Madoff Securities) to correctly answer the inquiries of the auditor.
Answer:
The solution as per the given problem is provided below throughout the explanation portion below.
Explanation:
The given values are:
Debt issued,
= 120
Pretax earnings,
= 80
Tax,
= 35%
All equity firm,
= $320
Number of common stock,
= 50
(a)
Balance sheet before the debt issue's announcement will be:
<u>Assets </u><u> 320</u>
<u>Debt </u><u> 0</u>
<u>Equity </u><u> 320</u>
then,
The total will be "320".
(b)
The per share price will be:
= 
= 
= 
or,
After tax, the net income will be:
= 
= 
= 
= 
(c)
The return on equity will be:
= 
= 
= 
or,
= 
(%)
Answer:
C. subject to review by higher levels of management in order to prevent the budgets from becoming too loose.
Explanation:
Self-imposed budgets typically are subject to review by higher levels of management in order to prevent the budgets from becoming too loose.
Self-imposed budget also known as the participative budget is a type of budget where individuals having responsibility for controlling costs, prepares their own budget estimates and present them to the top level of management for review.
