Answer:
C. All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers. That creature up in the sky is certainly flying, so it must also have feathers.
Explanation:
Syllogism is a logical argument with two premises and one conclusion. A categorical syllogism has three propositions which include two premises and one conclusion; a general/major premise, a minor premise and then a conclusion. The major premise,minor premise and conclusion in the above syllogism respectfully are
" All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers","That creature up in the sky is certainly flying", "so it must also have feathers".
The justice department because it is the one that help them to have something in common.
Explanation:
<em>Any</em><em> </em><em>four</em><em> </em><em>differences</em><em> </em><em>between</em><em> </em><em>stupa</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em>;</em>
- <em>Stupa</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>mainly</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>Buddhist</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>architecture</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>Shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>mainly</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>architecture</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>hindu</em><em>.</em>
- <em>The</em><em> </em><em>stupa</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>single</em><em> </em><em>towering</em><em> </em><em>but</em><em> </em><em>shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>has</em><em> </em><em>many</em><em> </em><em>towering</em><em>. </em>
- <em>Various</em><em> </em><em>Buddhist</em><em> </em><em>statues</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>kept</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>where</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>various</em><em> </em><em>gods</em><em> </em><em>atatues</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>kept</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em>. </em>
- <em>Most</em><em> </em><em>Buddhist</em><em> </em><em>use</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>meditate</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>perform</em><em> </em><em>religious</em><em> </em><em>performance</em><em> </em><em>whereas</em><em> </em><em>hindus</em><em> </em><em>use</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>architecture</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>performing</em><em> </em><em>various</em><em> </em><em>religious</em><em> </em><em>performance</em><em>. </em>
<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>it helps</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<em>Respect</em><em> </em><em>Nepalese</em><em> </em><em>architecture</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>love</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is: Democratic
Explanation:
The reasons behind this answer are two: the first one is that an executive situation would require them to be already part o the student council and look for the support of his society to back a proposal. Second, to be a judicial power it would involve a trial to find out if someone broke the established rules and requires the application of the pertinent laws according to his or her behavior. For it to be independent it would require him to fight for a cause without the support of an organization. therefore, democracy is the correct answer. Because a democratic process allows certain individuals to run to win the right to be representants of their societies.
Answer:
The colonists faced shortages of basic supplies such as food, weapons, and blankets. Some of the shortages were due to a lack of money. The British blockade also was successful in limiting the supplies we could get from other countries. The colonists also didn't have enough soldiers.
Explanation: