A.Loogos is the correct Answer
Schachter and singer are considered influential in the study of emotion because their theory introduced the influence of <u>cognitions on our aro usal levels</u>
<u></u>
The research of Schachter and Singer supports their Two-Factor Theory of Emotion, which contends that physiological aro usal in all emotions is entirely the same and that we name our aro usal in accordance with the accessible cognitions. They came to the conclusion that if a person experiences an aro usal state for which they do not immediately have an explanation, they would label this state and describe how they are feeling in terms of the cognitions that are currently available to them.
This study sheds light on how people evaluate their physiological state using various contextual signals. - This study may be helpful in the treatment of persons who have anxiety and panic attacks since it will enable them to recognize environmental triggers that could make them feel frightened and physiologically aro used.
To learn more about Schachter and singer here,
brainly.com/question/8924238
#SPJ4
Answer:
For question 1: 3 Right
for question 2: 1 Wrong
For question 3: 4 Right
For question 4: 2 Right
For question 5: 3 Right
Explanation:
<em> </em>I hope this helps :) :P
Answer:
Line-Item Veto, they can choose to take out things in a bill that they feel is unnecessary
This type of dualism describes that <u>each mind is a distinct nonphysical res</u>, an individual cluster of nonphysical substance, a thing whose properties are independent of a body that may be "connected". According to her, mental states come from these same non-physical, distinct and unique properties of substance.
A division of reality into two basic types of substance: the first was the ordinary type that had the characteristic of occupying a place in space, having length, width and height. Although the connotation of the material substance seemed to have no importance, it was largely exacerbated by Descartes, where his writings would serve as the basis for Newton's mechanical extrapolations.
However, there was a substance that was beyond its reach of explanation by mechanics. This substance was human conscious reason. This meant that Descartes proposed a different type of substance. A substance without extension or place in space, where its essential characteristic was the human activity of thinking.
The most acceptable point of the theory is that the mind and body performed different functions, and the most acceptable criticism is that the two worked together.
I believe it is a good theory, but the truth is that it is an erroneous theory, but for the time it was a revolution and it was from there that one began to understand the concept of what would be the "mind". The solution is that the theory is wrong, but it has led to great achievements today.
