Answer:
C = 36 pi or approximately 113.04
Step-by-step explanation:
The circumference of a circle is given by
C = 2*pi*r
C = 2*pi*18
C = 36 pi
We can approximate pi by 3.14
C = 36*3.14
C =113.04
3 ft is 1 meter
199 ft / 3 ft = 60.552 ft
Round 60.552 to the nearest hundreth
Answer = 60.55
Answer:
Following are the responses to the given question:
Step-by-step explanation:
In the first example, a team walks into a bar & chooses the random person to speak, in which situation, the woman who walks to the club has made a choice, he has selected a people with and who he wants to speak, it is a subjective preference. A choice cannot be random in statistical since it has a subjective preference. The first interpretation may therefore be randomized in general, but not arbitrary in statistics.
In the second example, i.e., the definition of Building tracks Example, a randomized wood piece is an identical piece or is different in size from other pieces. In this, piece wood has been differentiated by one's looks so, when asked to pick a random piece, we are likely to choose a non-uniform part rather than the uniform one. It is a random racial bias, so again in constructing pursuits the second definition could be random, but not a discrete one in stats.
In the identification numbers of random, we intentionally state that equal probability for each unit in the population of inclusion in the sampling. The definition essentially includes all sorts of predilection, and therefore refers to true allegiance, when we neither make that choice nor want to choose a separate unit.
Answer:
wait idk
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>
Answer with explanation:</h2>
Let p represents the population proportion.
From the given information, we have
, since alternative hypothesis is right tailed then the test is right tailed test.
Given : In a sample of 416 households that owned one or more vacation homes, 46 were minorities.
i.e. n= 416
Sample proportion :
Test statistic :
i.e.
P-value for right tailed test :
Since the p-value is less than the significance level (0.01), so we reject the null hypothesis.
Thus , we conclude that we have enough evidence to support the claim that that the percentage of vacation-home owners who are minorities is larger than 6 percent.