Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.
The 4-year term instrument's nominal rate is higher than the 2-year term instrument's nominal rate.
What is nominal rate?
The increase in payment you make to the lender for using the borrowed funds is known as the nominal interest rate.
The rate of compounding is higher for 2-year investments than for 4-year investments, which are compounded semi-annually.
As a result, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on nominal rate, here:
brainly.com/question/13324776
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
United States is producing 200 tons of hamburgers and 60 tons of tacos.
United States' opportunity cost for producing 1 ton of hamburgers
= 
= 0.3
United States' opportunity cost for producing 60 tons of tacos.
= 
= 3.33
So we see that US has a lower opportunity cost in producing hamburgers, so it has a comparative advantage in producing hamburgers.
Mexico is producing 40 tons of hamburgers and 50 tons of tacos.
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of hamburgers
= 
= 1.25
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of tacos
= 
= 0.8
So we see that Mexico has a lower opportunity cost in producing tacos, so it has a comparative advantage in making tacos.
Since US specializes in making hamburgers, it will produce 200 tons of hamburgers and 0 tons of tacos.
Mexico specializes in making tacos, it will produce 50 tons of tacos and 0 tons of hamburgers.
Answer:
40%
Explanation:
For computing the manufacturing cycle efficiency, first we have to compute the throughput time which is shown below:
Throughput time = Process time + Inspection time + Move time + Queue time
= 6 + 0.6 + 0.4 + 8
= 15
Now
Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) is
= Value added time (process time) ÷ Throughput time
= 6 ÷ 15
= 40%
We simply applied the above formulas so that the manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) could come
