Answer:
The answer is <em>false</em>.
Explanation:
Although very popular in crime novels and TV shows, microscopic hair analysis isn't as reliable as it may seem. It was widely used during 1950-s and 1960-s as the best test to match a hair sample with the suspect, but modern tests proved it to be wrong. Microscopic analysis can give some information about the hair sample such as origin (human, animal or synthetic fiber), color, pigment distribution... For example, if the hair sample found was brown, and the suspect was black-haired, we could claim that he was Innocent. But if the found hair was black, does that mean that we could be absolutely sure that the suspect is guilty? Of course not, microscopic analysis can not provide evidence for that claim. On the other hand, the best method for matching biological samples, at the present time, is DNA analysis.
The repeating stages a cell experiences, including cell division, compose the cell cycle, it is a sequence of events that lead first to the growth of the cell and later to the division into daughter cells. The cell cycle begins at the moment when a new cell appears, descended from another cell that has been divided, and ends at the moment when said cell, by subsequent division, originates new daughter cells.
The phenotype of the dominant gene.
When this happends a hurricane is caused. Hope this helped
What’s the picture for the question that you need an answer for?