Answer:
Background
Research on factors associated with partner violence against women is often framed within the context of gender inequality and power imbalances between husbands and wives—inequalities that are considered products of broader structural systems. Tanzania, a patriarchal society where high levels of partner violence exists, has gone through rapid economic and social changes over the past two decades. Increasing numbers of women are seeking paid work, and men’s ideals of manhood have reshaped with evidence of extra marital relations and alcohol use. Nationally representative population-based data documents 46.2% of ever-married women have experienced physical or sexual partner violence in their lifetime; 29.6% in the past year. In order to plan appropriate interventions to end violence against women, factors consistently associated with abuse need to be understood.
Methods
This study uses “couples” data from the 2015 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey to examine correlates of past year partner violence against women. Multivariate regression analysis was used to explore individual and relational-level variables—including socio-demographic characteristics and history of abuse among women, partner behavioural characteristics, and indicators of gender and economic inequality—among 1278 married and cohabiting couples.
Results
At the individual level, women’s experiences of non-partner violence (sexual abuse by a non-partner and witnessing violence in childhood) was strongly associated with risk and highlights that all forms of violence against women serve to keep them subordinated. Partner behavioural characteristics (polygamy and problematic alcohol use) were also associated with risk. Household socio-economic status, however, was not significantly associated with women’s risk in the final multivariate model. At the relational-level, men’s age difference of 10 or more years; and any employment (compared to none/unpaid) were associated with lower risk. When considering attitudes tolerant towards wife abuse, the strongest association with risk of violence was when both partners held tolerant views.
Conclusion
The findings support the assertions of
Answer:
Explanation
Elasticity is any change in the buyer and seller behavior dues to change of price and goods and services. example of elastic demand is gas while that of inelastic is gasoline.
Two reasons can be as follow:
1) Desire to protect folk culture. People have an innate desire to protect and carry on their folk culture and adoption of new culture may interfere with that vision.
2) Fear of change or outside influences. People might have a fear that the outside culture will influence them in many undesirable ways which can prevent the adoption.
Canada is the country that forms most of the Northern border of the United States. I recommend looking at the map and seeing what is directly above the 48 contiguous states.
Answer:
To distinguish consumers by their reserve price.
