Answer:
<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.
On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.
Answer:
E) sharing valuable technological know-how with a potential competitor.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Gibson Electronics who identifies licensees in various countries who produce and sell the company's products in their countries in return for a royalty fee on every unit sold. Gibson Electronics’ approach is risky because of the problems associated with sharing valuable technological know-how with a potential competitor. Technological know-how in organization can be regarded as sets of knowledge as well as skills which is developed by that participants and is used to guide the acquisition as well as creation, and operation of computer-based systems which gives enablements or brings about facilitation of the performance of business processes, sharing this with competitors in business could be dangerous potential competitors can embrace it to move their business forward which will affect the owner of the Technological know how Businesses in the market.
Answer:
$48.2
Explanation:
The increase in dividend is 3.9%
= 3.9/100
= 0.039
The recently paid dividend is $3.62
The required return is 11.7%
= 11.7/100
= 0.117
Therefore the price per share of the company stock can be calculated as follows
= 3.62(1+0.039)/0.117-0.039
= 3.62(1.039)/0.078
= 3.761/0.078
= 48.2
Hence the price per share is $48.2
Answer:
The correct answer would be, The Canadian Airline would have used Lost Customer Recovery Strategy.
Explanation:
When the sales of the Canadian Airline declines, they surveyed their target market which is Business Class Travelers. From the responses of the customers, they found out that customers feel bounded by the staff of the airplane. They think that they were totally controlled by the staff on board.
Now if the Canadian Airline would have surveyed their former customers, then they would have known why they left their airline, and what was their concerns and what they want in this airline; then the strategy used by them would have Lost Customer Recovery Strategy.
Answer:
$50,000
Explanation:
Since the service year is for a period of two year beginning from January 1 2018,the fair value of the shares options would be recognized over the two years on straight line basis,in other words $50,000 is the compensation expense for each i.e $100,000/2.
The appropriate entries would be a credit to paid in capital-share options account and debit goes to compensation expense in both years.
For instance ,2018 entries would:
Dr compensation expense $50,000
Cr paid in capital shares options $50,000
