1.
- Ordered construction of canals and buildings.
- Tried to improve their day to day lives.
- Purposed projects to make the city more beautiful.
2.
- Laws that they had to follow made by Hammurabi himself.
- It was consisted of 282 laws.
- It was the first written laws.
3.
I am almost sure these are the answers if not I apologize.
Answer:
This study offers a comparison of the differing architectural styles and forms in the Norman Kingdoms of Sicily and England, exploring what exactly differed, as well as attempting to determine why such differences exist in each area. In the Kingdom of England, the Normans largely imported their own forms from Normandy, incorporating little of the Anglo-Saxon architectural heritage. There are in fact examples of seemingly deliberate attempts to eliminate important Anglo-Saxon buildings and replace them with structures built along Norman lines. By contrast, in the Kingdom of Sicily, buildings erected after the arrival of the Normans feature a mix of styles, incorporating features of the earlier Islamic, Byzantine and local Italian Romanesque, as well as the Normans' own forms. It is difficult to say why such variance existed, but there are numerous possibilities. Some result from the way each state was formed: England had already existed as a kingdom when the Normans conquered the land and replaced the ruling class, while the Kingdom of Sicily was a creation of the Norman conquerors; furthermore, the length of time taken to complete the conquest contrasted greatly. Another reason is that the pre-conquest cultural situation varied, as England was overwhelmingly Anglo-Saxon, in juxtaposition to the Italian, Byzantine and Arab elements in the Mezzogiorno and Sicily. Additionally, the cultural and trading influence of the Byzantine Empire and Islamic nations may have contributed to the eclectic architecture found in the Kingdom of Sicily. Other forms of cultural and artistic expression in the Kingdom of Sicily likewise show a cultural blend absent in England. Finally, there will be a brief look at the political and social situation in the two realms, in order to understand if these cultural expressions are representative of dissimilar societies and models of government. In the Kingdom of Sicily, a number of non-Normans rose to prominence, and some families which had held power before continued to do so. In England, the Norman nobility was much larger and held far more high-ranking positions. Architectural differences are therefore somewhat symbolic.
The two different interpretations you are referring to are known as a strict and loose interpretation of the Constitution. Here is more information about both.
1) Strict interepretation- Individuals who favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution stated that in order for Congress or the President to act, the right they would be performing must be written into the US Constitution.
2) Loose interpretation- Individuals who favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution stated that the Constitution is flexible and there is room for broad interpretation. Essentially, these people argued that some powers in the Constitution are "implied."
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
There were many plans for the new land below South Carolina presented to King George II. Explain why the King chose Oglethorpe's plan. The King liked Oglethorpe's plan because he saw the potential for producing silk, indigos, and dyes for use by the English.
