1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8_murik_8 [283]
3 years ago
15

compare the relationships between the Spanish, English, and French with the respective Native groups they encountered.

Social Studies
1 answer:
adell [148]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Spanish remained hostile to the native groups as they considered to be uncivilized.

English avoided contact with the native groups, but that changed as the Native Indians helped them in settling in the New World.

French from the beginning remains friendly with the native as they relied on the fur trade.

Explanation:

French had a better relationship with the Native American compare to the other colonists in the New World. They kept a respectful relationship by signing treaties. French took furs pelts and in return gave manufactured goods like utensils, textiles, and weapons to the Native American.

Spanish had a very hostile relationship with the Native groups. Spaniards came to capture the land and make money for the emperor.

British at the beginning had a good bond with the Natives as they depend on there help for survival.

You might be interested in
GIVING BRAINLIEST AND EXTRA POINTS!!! (JUST TO LET U KNOW, ALL U HAVE TO DO IS FILL IN THE BLANK)
denis23 [38]

Answer free land gold and new things

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What was the intended purpose of federal legislation such as the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act?
Nastasia [14]

The intended purpose of federal legislation such as the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act is to increase the power of labor unions to negotiate for fair wages.

option A is the correct answer.

<h3>What is 1947 Taft-Hartley Act?</h3>

The Taft-Hartley Act act was enacted to fight for Labour union.

The labour union lack a bargaining power hence the act was to give them a voice and strengthen their bargaining power.

Therefore, The intended purpose of federal legislation such as the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act is to increase the power of labor unions to negotiate for fair wages.

Learn more on labour union below

brainly.com/question/881501

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Why do ralph and piggy tell samneric that they left jack's feast early?they want the twins to think they did not have fun there.
Lapatulllka [165]
They want to put guilt on the twins
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe why did you decided to go to college after graduating from high school or not to go to college after graduating from hi
Lorico [155]

Answer: I went to college either to get my bachelor's degree and become a doctor or work in many other high paying jobs. I did not go to college because I either have another way of income. Or it's because I did not have enough money to attend college, or I was too busy working for my family that I can't attend college

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What was the MAIN result of European
Andrej [43]

Answer:

Explanation:

Africa has long since been encountered by the presence of Europeans and their activities on the continent. Before the nineteenth century, European activities in Africa were restricted along the coast. Trade in slaves and other commodities with the interior states of Africa was conducted through local middlemen. Upon the abolition of the slave trade, legitimate trade was seen as the perfect substitute and the Europeans there scrambled and partitioned Africa for political, social and economic reasons. This also had economic, political and social consequences on the continent. This essay is a re-contextualization of the essence of the partition of Africa and it’s ramification on the continent. It will first deal with the factors that motivated the scramble for territories in Africa by the Europeans and later look at the effects on the continent.

The scramble for territories in Africa and the partition of the continent among the various European powers of late nineteenth century was triggered off mainly by the activities of one individual: King Leopold II of Belgium in the Congo Basin. King Leopold hired explorers led by Henry Morton Stanley to explore and navigate the Congo and arrange trade with the local leaders of the area. Publicly, King Leopold of a civilizing mission to carry the light “for millions of men still plunged in barbarism will be dawn of a better era”. Privately, Leopold had the idea of exploitation and profit making at the expense of the Africans. Other European countries such as Britain, France and Portugal became alarmed and as conflict over the Congo Basin seemed eminent, Otto Von Bismarck, the then German chancellor who was a pacifist called for conference in Berlin to discuss issue regarding the annexation of territories in Africa and other issues such as the slave trade in December 1884-1885(January). This conference is famously known as the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885. The causes for the scramble and partition of Africa as discussed below.

CAUSES OF THE PARTITION OF AFRICA

Economically, it was the time whereby the industrial revolution in Europe, particularly England had reached its peak. The Europeans therefore wanted a place to serve as a market for their manufactured goods. This would help boost the economy of the European nations and the surplus goods also would have a ready market in Africa. The Europeans therefore saw the need to acquire territories outside Europe to serve as a market for their surplus goods and Africa was their answer since it was a newly found continent by the Europeans. In the Gold Coast for example, the Europeans supplied manufactured products such as gin, tobacco, hardware, gun, gun powder, iron, glassware, European blankets and cotton and silk products. These goods found a ready market since they were new and comfortable for the large African population. The British with Gold Coast as their occupied territory benefitted from this trade as they also obtained products such as gold, ivory, animal skin etc. This new economic enterprise therefore boosted the economy of Britain and they were therefore ready to do whatever is possible to prevent any other European country from benefiting from this trade in the Gold Coast.

Again the European territories in Africa served as a place where raw materials could be easily obtained at relatively low prices to feed European manufacturing industries. Raw materials that were in abundance and obtained by the Europeans in the Gold Coast are gold, ivory, timber, cotton etc. These products which were in great demand in Europe were converted into finished goods and were sold to both Europeans and Africans. This helped in the accumulation of more capital to establish other industries in Europe. So to the Europeans, Africa was very valuable at that time and no European country would allow another European country to establish trade links in the “occupied” territories for trade.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What marked the beginning of the americas
    11·1 answer
  • Which supreme court case is correctly paired with the constitutional issue it addressed?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain reasons why two large firms merging together in the supermarket industry might experience diseconomies of scale.
    13·1 answer
  • According to Cassidy, who should be a parent ?
    13·1 answer
  • Challenges of exploration
    14·2 answers
  • You overhear a psychologist presenting a lecture to an introductory psychology class. The teacher mentions "purposeful or goal-d
    11·2 answers
  • What 4 countries gained their independence in the early 1800's​
    10·1 answer
  • "To follow the truth is our responsibility".Elaborate this sentence.​
    15·1 answer
  • The founder of the Mughal Empire was Akbar.
    7·1 answer
  • What are some of the main reasons why climate change is such a difficult issue on which to generate a global consensus that woul
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!