Agribusiness, i believe is your answer
hope this helps :)
Answer:
could likely result in a notable loss of sales to competitors
Explanation:
In the case of the perfect competitive market wheen the price of the firm is increased from $179 to $199 as compared to the prevailing market price so this means that there should be the loss with respect to the sales for the competitors or rivalrs as this would result the firm to lose its overall shares to its rivalry
Therefore the above statement should be considered true
Answer:
when you ask a question and you get one answer you cant give someone brainliest until another person answers and after two people answer you chose which one is the best by clicking the little crown in the upper right corner of their answers
Explanation:
Answer:
The three scenarios describe a competitive market.
Explanation:
1) In the competitive market buyers and sellers are price takers, this means that there are many producers and consumers and none of them are able to intervene in price and market. Price is given, ie price is determined by interaction in the market. 2) The products are identical. That is, no company will make a profit due to differentiated products. In perfect competition, companies produce identical products, and the consumer is indifferent to the product characteristics of each company. 3) There is free entry and exit of companies and factors of production, ie there is no cost to enter and exit any sector. This means that factors can migrate from one sector to another without incurring costs, meaning there are no barriers to entry and exit from any sector.
Thus, from items 1 and 2, consumers and buyers are price takers, that is, they cannot influence the price determined by the market. Item 3 is about achieving zero profit or normal long-term profit. This is because the free entry and exit of companies avoids extraordinary profits by encouraging companies to migrate to sectors that earn higher profits in the short term. Thus, in perfect competition, compa
