The critical path is a sequence of activities that determine the earliest date by which a project can be completed.
Answer: The Contract is valid.
Explanation:
Under the UCC’s Statute of Frauds, transactions above $500 for goods cannot be made orally alone and have to be written in writing as well. This is the law that Rosenfield relied on.
However, Fallsview can argue that the Passover Retreat is not a Good, but rather a Service in which case it does not fall under the Statute.
The main bone of contention thereby becomes, if indeed it is a service or a good.
If it is a Hybrid of both, then the Court needs to decide if the services outweigh the goods involved.
From the text we see that the following were included in the package, food, entertainment, and lectures on religious subjects.
Food is the only good there and is outweighed by Entertainment and lectures on religious subjects.
As such, the contract is valid as it is for more service than good.
Answer:
If a large Number of Lakeview residents are questioned, about 44% of them will be Club fans.
Explanation:
Reporting the probability outcome of a singular observation are usually reported as stated above, that the probability of a random sample of Lakeview resident being a club fan is 0.44%. However from a long run relative frequency approach, it requires just more Than one random sample but a large number of samples being evaluated over time.
Hence to expresa as a long run relative frequency, it could be stated as ; report gathered from many Lakeview residents, about 44% of them are Club fans.