Answer:
D. Social roles.
Explanation:
These are seen to be positions which someone or a group of persons are attached to or assigned to. This is to impact and grow social influences on other people. Here, a person is seen to associate with set positive attitudes that build positivity growth towards others without any bridge of connectivity within him and other people. These roles are seen to make people of higher class to bring themselves low to affect others positively.
Clovis was the king of Frank’s and the ruler of Gaul from 481 - 511, which was an important period (the transformation of the Roman Empire to Europe). His dynasty, which was called the Merovingians, lasted for over 200 years. He was the Frankish kingdom’s political and religious founder. He spread Christianity as he spread his empire, unifying his empire. Spreading Christianity also spread culture, merchants, missionaries, languages, and soldiers.
Answer:
The type of sampling used in Jankowski's study of gangs is Option D. Stratified sampling.
Explanation:
With stratified sampling, the researcher will partition the population into different groups, usually based on some characteristic that is common to that group. In this case, it was the different kinds of gang membership. Then, the researcher will take a sample of people within each specific group using another sampling method like simple random sampling for instance. The groups that are used in stratified sampling are called strata. Another example would be a national survey that is divided into strata of the different major ethnic groups that comprise the national population.
Tort reform is a big part of health care reform because "It works to cut legal costs and keep medical issues out of the courts".
In general, after finding factually noteworthy confirmation we see that therapeutic tort reform is related with a lessening in health care services costs. In testing the impact of one, two, and three changes, we locate a critical negative connection between tort change and social insurance costs in states where two restorative tort changes were passed. In particular, we find that the section of two therapeutic tort changes altogether diminished both aggregate premiums and manager commitments to premiums. The outcomes were to a great extent irrelevant for states that passed one and three changes.
