Answer:
<em>= 279</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
= + (n - 1)d
d = -
~~~~~~~~~
d = - 17 + 25 = - 9 + 17 = - 1 + 9 = 8
= - 25 + 8(39 - 1) = 279
<em>= 279</em><em> </em>
Answer: 271
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula we use to find the sample size is given by :-
, where is the two-tailed z-value for significance level of
p = prior estimation of the proportion
E = Margin of error.
If prior estimation of the proportion is unknown, then we take p= 0.5 , the formula becomes
Given : Margin of error : E= 0.05
Confidence level = 90%
Significance level
Using z-value table , Two-tailed z-value for significance level of
Then, the required sample size would be :
Simplify,
Hence, the required minimum sample size =271
Answer:
yes you CAN you can use the descending to ascending formular but on people in which they might be a mixup of tallest and shortest
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given two similar triangles.
Corresponding parts of similar figures have same ratio.
<u>Use ratios to find the value of x:</u>
- (4x - 5)/(x + 7) = 35/12.5
- (4x - 5)/(x + 7) = 14/5
- 5(4x - 5) = 14(x + 7)
- 20x - 25 = 14x + 98
- 20x - 14x = 98 + 25
- 6x = 123
- x = 123/6
- x = 20.5
<u>Find the value of FG:</u>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let B be the number of black cars and S the number of silver.
We know that B/S = 7/4
We also know that B - S = 12
Rearrange the first: B = 7S/4
B - S = 12
7S/4 - S = 12
7S - 4S = 48
3S = 48
S = 16
B/S = 7/4
B/16 = 7/4
4B = 112
B = 28
B + S = 44 cars
I can't add the tape diagram here, but show two ribbons (tapes) for each car color and drawn so one can see the relative numbers of each.