Answer: its 0 right or is it supposed to be a face or sumthin
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
13224512412r21414ws
Step-by-step explanation:
homework?2312425125223
It could be seen from the table that when x is 2, the y value is 0. Thus, it can be concluded that the x intercept is (2,0)
The correct answer is B
4/6=2/3 (divide both numerator and denominator by 2 (gcd)).
Hope this helps.
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
