Question Completion with options:
a. Past performance information provided directly by the offeror should not be relied upon.
b. The past performance evaluation satisfies the responsibility determination required under FAR subpart 9.1.
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
d. Offerors with demonstrated past performance that is neither relevant nor recent must not be removed from further consideration for award.
Answer:
The statement that is true regarding the evaluation of the past performance is:
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
Explanation:
It has been established that past performance is the best indicator of future performance. Past performance can predict future performance, behavior, and success. Organizations that achieve some good performance in the past build the required confidence, which will help them to forge ahead in the present and future. This is why in selecting companies for a negotiated competitive services acquisition, even the past performance of predecessor companies should be reviewed to get a better handle on the company's ability to deliver on the projects.
Answer:
Management skills is the answer
Answer:
y = 11 x
Explanation:
The relationship between two variables x,y is said to be a proportional relationship if the ratio between the values of the two variables is constant:
(3)
where k is the a constant value valid for all pairs (x,y).
In this problem, we are told that Charmaine earns $11 per hour. Here we call:
y = amount of money earned
x = time
We can see that the relationsip between x and y is proportional. In fact:
- after 1 hour, Charmaine has earned $11 (1)
- after 2 hours, Charmaine has earned $22 (2)
.. and so on
For (1), we find
so k = 11
For (2), we find
so k = 11
So, k = 11 for every pair (x,y), so the two variables have proportional relationship.
Moreover, we can write an equation that relates the two variables re-arranging eq.(3).

Answer:
The current ratio is 2.98
Explanation:
total current assets = cash + receivables + inventory + other current assets
= $102 million + 94 million + 182 million + 18 million
= $396 million
total current liabilities = accounts payable + current portion of long term debt
= $98 million + $35 million
= $133 million
current ratio = current assets/current liabilities
= [$396 million]/[$133 million]
= 2.98
Therefore, The current ratio is 2.98
Answer:
Bondholders have a degree of legal protection against default risk, but it is not comprehensive.
Explanation:
A bond can be defined as a debt or fixed investment security, in which a bondholder (investor or creditor) loans an amount of money to the bond issuer (government or corporations) for a specific period of time. The bond issuer are expected to return the principal (face value) at maturity with an agreed upon interest (coupon), which are paid at fixed intervals.
The par value of a bond is its face value and it comprises of its total dollar amount as well as its maturity value. Also, the par value of a bond gives the basis on which periodic interest is paid. Thus, a bond is issued at par value when the market rate of interest is the same as the contract rate of interest. This simply means that, a bond would be issued at par (face) value when the bond's stated rated is significantly equal to the effective or market interest rate on the specific date it was issued.
In Economics, bonds could either be issued at discount or premium. A bond that is being issued at a discount has its stated rate lower than the market interest rate, on the specific date of issuance while a bond that is issued at a premium, has its stated rate higher than the market interest rate on the specific date of issuance.
Default risk in bonds refer to the risk that a bond issuer (borrower) is unable to pay the principal or interest agreed upon in the contract with the bondholder (lender) in a timely manner.
Hence, the true statement about default risk is that bondholders have a degree of legal protection against default risk, but it is not comprehensive.