Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The Fair Credit Billing Act is a federal law in the USA, that is, it is valid in all states and must be respected in any region.
This law has as main objective to protect the consumer from unfair charges and errors of any type of merchant. In addition, the law allows to resolve any conflict that may act between consumer and merchant, arising from purchases made with a credit card and resulting from any collection error.
This law may, for example, allow a chargeback when there is a dispute for goods and services over a credit card purchase that cannot be resolved with the merchant.
A chargeback is a return on the money invested by the consumer in a product, when the merchant makes a mistake that leaves the consumer at a disadvantage.
Answer:
<u>c. parties are urged to be spontaneous and even impractical</u>
Explanation:
- Brainstorming is a creative group activity in which efforts are made to find a specific answer to the problem by the gathering of a list of ideas possible by the members of the group.
- People are allowed to think more freely and give suggestions as many as possible in a spontaneous manner and create innovative and new ideas as possible.
- Methods to improve the brainstorming is by paying attention to everyone’s ideas, take breaks, and do not rush.
Conduct disorder is a repetitive and persistent pattern of antisocial behavior that results in problems at school or work or in relationships with others.
Conduct disorder comes under the category of behavior disorder .In this the child faces problem to connect with the people in his environment. Unlike the normal people it becomes tough for the people with this order to establish their connection with the masses.
He sought to have an antisocial behavior.
Children with mental health problem tends to face this disorder which prevents them to interact with people.
The disorder can be further divided into two
childhood onset and adolescent onset
To learn more about conduct disorder click here:
brainly.com/question/1298832
#SPJ4
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
Polytheistic beliefs practices existed before rise of Islam in the 7th century
I hope that helped you
