Answer:
For wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses – often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the day.
and for the poor
,
Poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could collapse or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a servant or slave. Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time – chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and who they would marry.
Explanation:
President Kennedy was persuaded by MLKs i have a dream speech.
Antonio Vivaldi did not write music during the romantic era.
At its core, Romantic era composers viewed music as a means of personal and emotional expression. In fact, they believed that music was the most suitable art form for expressing all human emotions.
As a result, Romantic composers expanded the range of emotional content. Music was expected to communicate with its audience, often using narrative forms to tell different stories.
Romantic composers placed the emotional or narrative content of music above its form. As such, they broke many of the classical songwriting rules. Romantic composers did not reject or violate the musical language developed during the Classical period.
learn more about Antonio Vivaldi here: brainly.com/question/4709848
#SPJ4
Im pretty sure its because it showed that kings or monarchs had a limit in power
Answer:
Japan has a parliamentary system of government like Britain and Canada. Unlike the Americans or the French, the Japanese do not elect a president directly. Diet members elect a prime minister from among themselves. The prime minister forms and leads the cabinet of ministers of state.
Explanation:
sana maka help.
