Answer:
the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost
Explanation:
In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>
In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.
The first major American opposition to British policy came in 1765 after Parliament passed the Stamp Act, a taxation measure designed to raise revenues for a standing British army in America. Under the banner of “no taxation without representation,” colonists convened the Stamp Act Congress in October 1765 to vocalize their opposition to the tax. With its enactment in November, most colonists called for a boycott of British goods, and some organized attacks on customhouses and homes of tax collectors.
After months of protest in the colonies, Parliament finally voted to repeal the Stamp Act in March 1766. Most colonists continued to quietly accept British rule until Parliament’s enactment of the Tea Act in 1773, a bill designed to save the faltering British East India Company by greatly lowering its tea tax and granting it a monopoly on the American tea trade. The low tax allowed the company to undercut even tea smuggled into America by Dutch traders, and many colonists viewed the act as another example of taxation tyranny. Hope this helps!
Answer:
1. the state department and department of homeland security
2. Justices choose which cases will be heard.
Explanation:
The Senate and Congress are legislative branch, Supreme Court is judicial branch. All US government departments are in the executive branch, such as Department of Health, Department of Education, Department of Justice, etc.
In the Supreme Court, 4 out of 9 justices must vote on if the certain case will be heard.
The statement above describes normative ethics as it is the
one responsible for explaining moral behavior of which an individual exhibits.
It is a way of explaining with the use of rules or ethics, and even theories,
in pointing out an individual’s way of doing or handling things that could
affect their choices in a way whether it is right or wrong.
