Answer:
c. a competitor's confidential memos.
Explanation:
Using a competitor's confidential memos for external analysis is not an ethical practice. To use confidential internal memos is unethical and it might be illegal in some situations because you might use an illegal and unethical way to obtain that information. All the other options Trade shows, Advertisements and annual report are the publicized data which could be used. Competitive Intelligence is a practice in the market to to gather competitor's data by using all the public information available which is legal and ethical too.
B. All consumers are able to purchase an amount equal to their quantity demanded.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
c. ineffective.
Explanation:
In stock market, there are so many firms upon whose stocks are being traded on by various investors. Most of these stocks could be legit while others could be fraud through price fixing or mispricing. <em>Evidence carried out has shown that, it is highly ineffective studying public information in-order to identify mispriced stocks.</em>
Answer:
The production level that maximizes Silky's profit is 
ties.
Explanation:
Hi
First of all, as we have 
, we need to transcript it as price in function of the quantity so
Then we need to find income function that is 
. After derivate it 
.
The optimum level is when we have 
, therefore,
, as we clear it for 
we find that
, finally as we have that is measured in hundreds of ties, the production level that maximizes Silky's profit is ties.
Answer:
The payment made by Cordelia
Explanation:
In the scenario it stated clearly that Rupert filled out what would have been a normal application form for operational license in the country
However Cordelia using connections was able to schedule a meeting with the government official that <u>has the authority to determine which foreign companies get licenses, and pays him $200 to approve their license.</u>
Cordelia payment is nothing short of bribery and corruption because it is not a legally required payment and the motive was clearly to unduly influence the minister to approve their license.
Such payment will likely violate the foreign corrupt practices act
