Answer: No, Paul has not breached a contract.
Explanation: To answer this, we must first we must define what a contract is.
A contract is an agreement between two or more people that is legally binding, and which guides or governs the actions or conducts of the parties involved.
A quality that makes a contract legally binding is that it is enforceable by law.
In the scenario given in the question above, Paul has not breached any contract because there isn't one. The promise to buy dinner has not been legally bound, therefore, it is not enforceable by law, in essence, it is not qualified to be called a contract.
A content analysis of an organization's messages, readability studies, and readership surveys are all tools used to conduct a(n) communications audit.
The destiny price represents the anticipated worth of an unmarried quantity, while the prevailing value represents the present day well worth. is the discounted value of a chain of consecutive destiny payments of equal quantity.
The future fee of a single quantity is equal to the quantity we store or make investments nowadays, the present value of an item, and such multiplied by one plus the hobby charge to the nth strength, where n is the range of compounding durations we maintain that precept within the bank or the number of periods that we make investments the money.
Some of the maxima typically used PR gear consist of press releases, information conferences, and publicity. Sponsorships, product placements, and social media additionally generate a number of positive.
Present value = Factor x Accumulated amount
Learn more about readability here:-brainly.com/question/3923453
#SPJ4
Formal communication ensures a proper channel of information flow between the superior and their corresponding subordinates. This results in a clear establishment of line of authority and workflow. Making responsibilities clear for subordinates is very efficient in this form of communication.
Answer:
In every form of analysis, it is always safer to take a macro or holistic view of the situation. This is true for the investment performance of a manager. One investment decision that went right does not suffice to classify an investment portfolio manager as proficient, neither is one that went south enough to tag him deficient.
The forecasting ability of managers, on the balance of probability, will vary for different cases, with a helicopter view of providing a more accurate measure of their performance.
However, if it was possible to analyse the market for volatility and adjust our forecasts it becomes unnecessary to look at and analyse all the information from a 12-month cycle before coming to terms about the performance of the manager.
Cheers!
Answer:
$52
$ 1.33
- consumer price will increase
- consumer surplus will decrease
- import will decrease
- reduced export
- portends gloom for the general outlook for the economy
Explanation:
Given domestic demand curve, S(p) = 20p⁻⁰°⁵
the domestic supply curve S(p)= 5p⁰°⁵
world price is $7.00
using calculus to determine the changes in consumer surplus
by consumer surplus means in this case supply exceeds demand
we establish the equilibrium point where the supply and demand functions meet or are equal
solving 20p⁻⁰°⁵ = 5p⁰°⁵
20/5 = p⁰°⁵/p⁻⁰°⁵
4 = p⁰°⁵⁺⁰°⁵
4= p = q which is the quantity produced
consumer surplus = maximum price willing to pay - Actual price
= ∫⁴₀ dp dp - p* q
= ∫⁴₀20p⁻⁰°⁵ dp- 7* 4
= 20∫⁴₀p⁻⁰°⁵ dp -28
= 20/0.5 p⁰°⁵- 28
= 40 *4⁰°⁵ - 28 = $52
producer surplus = it is a measure of producer welfare. It is measured as the difference between what producers are willing and able to supply a good for and the price they actually receive
thus producer surplus = p* q - ∫⁴₀ d(s) dp
= 7 * 4 - ∫⁴₀ 5p⁰°⁵ dp
= 28 - 5 ∫⁴₀ p⁰°⁵ dp
= 28 -5 *2/3 p¹°⁵
= 28 -5 *2/3 4¹°⁵
=$ 1.33
welfare from eliminating free trade
- consumer price will increase
- consumer surplus will decrease
- import will decrease
- reduced exports
- portends gloom for the general outlook for the economy
