Answer:
2000
Step-by-step explanation:
Increase 1000 by 1000 in addition.
Modeled in an equation, the situation is 1000 + 1000.
1000 + 1000 = 2000
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
it could be -50.35 and 50.35 since the absolute value is just the positive value of the number
8x^2 -3 = 2
add 3 to each side
8x^2 = 5
divide by 8
x^2 =5/8
take the square root of each side
x = +- sqrt (5/8)
Number 2 for question 1 and number 4 for question 2