I believe the answer is: <span>A humanistic psychologist
</span><span>A humanistic psychologist aimed to understand how a behavior is fomred after considering the personalities and personal experiences that happen specifically to a person. They tend to believe that behaviors is the end product of how each individuals perceive the world.</span>
<span>The pre-operational stage is characterized by egocentric thought. This is the second stage and lasts from about age two until age seven. The child is learning to speak, but cannot yet think abstractly and use logic. The child in this stage focuses primarily on themselves and has a hard time taking the perspective of others. The child assumes that others view the world in the same way that they do.</span>
Parents are often faced with lots of different kinds of disagreements among their children and handling this kind of problem solving requires both emotional and practical kind of intelligence.
Practical intelligence is a style of intelligence projected by Robert Sternberg that refers to one's ability to effectively navigate real-life things and solve real-life issues. During this case, the issues and things are associated with parent-child disagreements.
Emotional intelligence, on the opposite hand, are often outlined as a capability that allows us to acknowledge, identify, regulate, and utilize emotions. During this case, parents have to be compelled to be able to regulate the emotions that will emerge throughout their disagreements with their children.
To learn more about Emotional intelligence here
brainly.com/question/9944825
#SPJ4
Answer:
It blends classical Greek and Roman elements with Christian subject matter and decorative pattern from the pagan north.
Artistic forms and technique of the early mediaeval world include adopt ones, like relief sculptures (especially those done on ivory), frescoes , mosaics.
The question is missing two important elements. The question: "Where do you stand on this issue?" and Why?
The question also invites us to watch a video for further reference. It is a TV News Show that interviews a lawyer, expert in the subject of marriage and divorce.
What the lawyer basically says is that the law states that the give is good only if it meets the condition of marriage. This means that it is the property of the other person meanwhile people are married. In my opinion, the ring should be a symbol of commitment, not as expensive as it has become due to marketing and advertising. If it is a commitment and things do not result, then, the ring loses its true value and should be returned.
