Answer:
$0
Explanation:
According to US GAAP the reduction in the value of the asset due to a decrease in the fair value. It means when fair value of the asset is reduced than the book value of the asset.
Amortized Cost / Book value = $50,000
Market Value = $53,000
Discounted Value = $51,000
There is no Impairment loss on this asset as the fair market value is more than the book value of the asset.
Answer:
One company pays 100%, the other re-reimburses 50%
Explanation:
If an environmental assessment found that the two companies share joint and several liability for a hazardous materials cleanup.
What could happen if the two of them don't agree to cooperate in the cleanup is that one of the companies will eventually settle the costs fully while the other party will have to reimburse the party that pays, 50%.
The paying company could make claims because the environmental impact assessment has already found both companies jointly liable. hence each company ought to jointly share the costs
Answer:
Dr. Cr.
February 2, 2012
Inventory $30,000
Account Payable $30,000
February 10, 2012
Account Payable $30,000
Discount received $600
Cash $29,400
Explanation:
Term 2/10, n/30 means there is a cash settlement discount of 2% is available if the payment is made within 10 days after the purchase of goods. Net credit period is 30 days. Purchases were made on February 2 and Payment was made on February 10 within the discount period, so Shankar Company is entitled to claim the discount of 2%. Cash will be paid net of discount.
Discount = $30,000 x 2% = $600
Cash Payment = $30,000 - $600 = $29,400
Answer:
price fixing agreement
Explanation: Price fixing is an agreement (written, verbal) among competitors to sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price. These competitors who agree to this agreement are responsible for raising, lowering, or stabilizing prices according to their competitive terms. Generally, consumers make choices to what products and services to buy, and they expect that the price should be determined freely on the basis of supply and demand, not by an agreement among competitors. in this type of case, prices tend to be higher which is a major concern for the consumers.
Answer:
286.5
Explanation:
P=99-qa-qb
MRa=99-2qb-qb
MCa=48
99-2qa-qb=48
Qa=25.5-0.5qb{ best response function of firm A)
MRb=99-qa-2qb
MCb=4
99-qa-2qb=4
Qb=47.5-0.5qa{ best response function of form b}
Qb=47.5-0.5(25.5-0.5qb)
Qb=34.75/0.75=46.33
Qa=25.5-0.5*46.33=2.33
Total world output=46.33+2.33=48.66
Total world emission=0.5*48.66=24.33
p=1146-qa-qb-qc
MRa=1146-2qa-qb-qc
MCa=0
1146-2qa-qb-qc=0
Qa=573-0.5(qb+qc) best response function of firm a)
By symmetry,
Qb=573-0.5(qa+qc)
Qc=573-0.5(qa+qb)
Qb+qc=1146-qa-0.5(qb+qc)
Qb+qc=764-qa/1.5
Qa=573-0.5(764-qa/1.5)=191+qa/3
Qa=191*3/2=286.5
Qa=Qb=Qc=286.5
Total output=3*286.5=859.5( cournot equilibrium market output)
Cartel output=573
Lower QUANTITY in cartel equilibrium compare to cournot equilibrium
=859.5-573
=286.5
