The perimeter of a square is the sum of its sides and they
are all equal, so to obtain the length of each of them we divide the perimeter
of the first fence between 4:
P1= 64 feet/4 sides
P1= 16 feet
Then, the length of each side of the second fence will
increase 2 feet at each end, as shown in the figure. We have then that the
perimeter of the second fence is:
P2 = 20 feet x 4 sides
P2 = 80 feet
The sum of the perimeters of both fences is:
PT = P1 + P2
PT = 64 feet + 80 feet
PT = 144 feet
Total cost = 1.17 $ x 144 feet
Total cost = 168.48 $
The total cost of the fences was $ 168.48
Answer:
B. Beth's age is 18 years, and Sally's age is 42 years.
Step-by-step explanation:
You can solve this question in a couple of different ways. First, you can use process of elimination. You know that Sally is older than Beth because she has to be 3 times older 6 years ago, so you can get rid of options C and D because they both show Beth as being older. Now you only have A and B, and you can use a different process. Now from just looking at it, you can tell that A actually already shows Sally as 3 times Beth's age, 15 * 3 = 45. If you go to B, you can go ahead and subtract 6 from 18 (Beth's age) which will give you 12, and then multiply that by 3 to get 36. Now if you take 42 (Sally's age) and subtract 6 from it as well, you will get 36. This means that is lines up. To simplify, you are subtracting 6 from both 18 and 42, and then you are multiplying the lower number by 3 to see if it gets to the bigger number.
Hope this helped ^-^
Yes, yes it is; well done.
Answer:
7:1
Step-by-step explanation:
28:4=
7(4):1(4)=
7:1
Hope this helps!
Answer:
(4,5)
Step-by-step explanation:
The "feasible region" has vertices (0,0), (7,0), (5,4), and (4,5)
P = 5x + 6y
Plug in each vertices in P and find out which give maximum value
(0,0) => P= 5(0) + 6(0) = 0
(7,0) => P= 5(7) + 6(0) = 35
(5,4) => P= 5(5) + 6(4) = 49
(4,5) => P= 5(4) + 6(5) = 50
We got maximum P=50 for vertex (4,5)
So the coordinates of the point that has the maximum value is (4,5)
