Answer:
A. limited details of offer
Explanation:
The offer is strong as it reaches only the persons that are fans and will be more interested in this event. The only particular reason for this offer to fail is that the message won't contain enough information about the event and this will lose the attention of the fans.
When a manufacturer saturates the market, the manufacturer is engaging in intensive distribution.
Intensive distribution can be define as the way in which companies or manufacturer made available or distribute their products from retail outlet to wholesaler outlet.
Most companies use intensive distribution marketing strategy to increase sales and to sell out the products in their warehouse so as to restock or restore new products.
Intensive distribution help to create product awareness to those people that are not aware of the products due to the fact that the products can be find everywhere.
Inconclusion the manufacturer is engaging in intensive distribution.
Learn more about intensive distribution here:
brainly.com/question/24250512
Well that's not really a question. More of an opinion.
The answer to this problem is "CHAMPION" such as when the <span> Senior Executive of the company who promotes the project and ensures its support, both financially and administratively aspects, at the highest or the top levels of the organization is needed to fill the role of a CHAMPION on a development team where he will leads and facilitate to achieve the common goals of the entire organization.</span>
Yes , Judy and Kristy have an enforceable binding contract
Explanation:
Kristy Johnston, Judy Olsen, and Joyce Johnston, their mother, owned real estate as common buyers. After Joyce died, she left Kristy her one-third share in the house. Kristy sent Judy a letter in 2009 promising Judy to purchase or sell Judy's share in the property.
Judy accepted the sale bid from Kristy. Kristy then tried to refuse Judy's approval and to cancel her bid for sale. Judy lodged a Kristy lawsuit.
The court granted the summary judgment to Judy finding that a contract had been drawn up between the letters exchanged between Judy and Kristy which satisfied the frauds ' status. The Supreme Court ruled that the district court decided out that an enforceable arrangement was established by exchanging letters from the parties.