Answer:
-3v
Step-by-step explanation:
-6v is a negative when 3v is positive
when you add 3v to -6v it equals -3v since 6 is greater
Answer:
Exponential Regression. An exponential regression is the process of finding the equation of the exponential function that fits best for a set of data. As a result, we get an equation of the form y=abx where a≠0 .
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
12.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is how to round 12.36 to the nearest whole number. In other words, this is how to round 12.36 to the nearest integer.
12.36 has two parts. The integer part to the left of the decimal point and the fractional part to the right of the decimal point:
Integer Part: 12
Fractional Part: 36
Our goal is to round it so we only have an integer part using the following rules:
If the first digit in the fractional part of 12.36 is less than 5 then we simply remove the fractional part to get the answer.
If the first digit in the fractional part of 12.36 is 5 or above, then we add 1 to the integer part and remove the fractional part to get the answer.
The first digit in the fractional part is 3 and 3 is less than 5. Therefore, we simply remove the fractional part to get 12.36 rounded to the nearest whole number as:
12
Answer:
The p value would be given by:
For this case since th p value is lower than the significance level of0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly different from 46.7 MPG
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
represent the mean
represent the population standard deviation
sample size
represent the value to verify
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true mean for this case is 46.7, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since we know the population deviation the statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value would be given by:
For this case since th p value is lower than the significance level of0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly different from 46.7 MPG
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation: