The correct answer is the theory of family resemblance.
Wittgenstein was an Austrian-English philosopher who lectured at Cambridge University in the 1930s and 1940s. Wittgenstein was critical of the definition approach, and instead proposed the theory of family resemblance. According to the theory of family resemblance, words are not connected to other words and ideas by just one key feature, but rather through a various common features. Just like family members have resemblances and are similar to each other not through one trait, but through many traits, so are words.
Answer:
Gender schemas.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, children pick up what is gender appropriate and gender inappropriate in their culture, and develop gender gender schemas that shape how they perceive the world and what they remember. For example, if a boy is given toy soldiers to play with, and a girl is given a house with dolls or a toy kitchen to play with, they are already building their idea of gender. This cognitive theory explains how individuals become gendered in society, having gender-associated information from the earliest memories, transforming then into a particular view of society.
Answer:
Strong bargaining power of the buyers
Explanation:
According to David, Walmart, using its large size and volume purchases, negotiates with manufacturers and wholesalers to keep supply costs low so that Walmart can offer lower prices to its customers. This is an example of Strong bargaining power of the buyers. In this scenario the Walmart is acted as a buyer since it is negotiating with the manufacturer and wholesalers.
Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
