Answer:
Assume that you are a new analyst hired to evaluate the capital budgeting projects of the company which is considering investing in two CPEC projects, “Expansion Zone North” and “Expansion Zone East”. The initial cost of each project is Rs. 10,000. Company discount all projects based on WACC. Further, all the projects are equally risky projects and the company uses only debt and common equity for financing these projects. It can borrow unlimited amounts at an interest rate of rd 10% as long as it finances at its target capital structure, which calls for 50% debt and 50% common equity. The dividend for next period is $2.0, its expected that they will grow at the constant growth rate of 8%, and the company’s common stock sells for $20. The tax rate is 50%.
<span>it is true that under the specific charge-off method, a deduction for a bad debt is taken when the debt is determined to be worthless. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
An outward shift in demand will occur if income increases, in the case of a normal good; however, for an inferior good, the demand curve will shift inward noting that the consumer only purchases the good as a result of an income constraint on the purchase of a preferred good.
The document that explains your rights and responsibilities as a federal student loan borrower is A. your master promissory note.
The master promissory note refers to the legal document where one promises to repay their loans and any fees or accrued interests to the Department of Education.
The <em>master promissory note</em> also explains the terms and the conditions of the loan that's taken. It's simply a legally binding document. One has to understand the rights and then responsibilities before one takes the loan.
In conclusion, the correct option is your master promissory note.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25077675
Answer:
b. Jim may have been misrepresented in the story by the newspaper agency and the company might face legal consequences.
Explanation:
Jim has the right to take legal action against the company for releasing the story. The investigation had not been completed and all facts had not been established by the company.
Also the newspaper did not contact Jim to get his own side of the story before publishing, that could have revealed pertinent information about the case.
