Answer:
799
Step-by-step explanation:
600 is 10 times larger than 60
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
H0 : μ = 15.7
H1 : μ < 15.7
This is a one sample t test :
Test statistic = (xbar - μ) ÷ (s/√(n))
n = sample size = 33
Using calculator :
The sample mean, xbar = 15.41
The sample standard deviation, s = 0.419
Test statistic = (15.41 - 15.70) ÷ (0.419/√(33))
Test statistic = - 3.976
Using the Pvalue calculator :
Degree of freedom, df = n - 1 ; 33 - 1 = 32
Pvalue(-3.976, 32) = 0.000187
Decison region :
Reject H0 if Pvalue < α
Since Pvalue < α ; we reject H0
There is significant evidence to conclude that the true average height of the seedlings treated with an extract from Vinca minor roots is less than 15.7 cm.
Answer:
m=4
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the slope formula: y2 - y1 / x2 - x1
m = 4 - (-4) / 5 - 3
m = 8 / 2
m = 4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that for a biology project, you measure the weight in grams and the tail length in millimeters of a group of mice.
The correlation is r = 0.9
If you had measured tail length in centimeters instead of millimeters, what would be the correlation?
For this we must understand the meaning of correlation and formula
Correlation is a measure of linear association between the two variables and always lie between -1 and 1
This is got by dividing covariance of (x,y) by product of std deviation of x and y
So because we changed the units of length correlation coefficient would not change.
It would remain the same as 0.90
