The correct answer is Cause and effect
Explanation:
The text presented focuses on the economic crisis of 2008. In this, the author first refers to this event through a general statement "Many people are confused about why our economy went to shambles in 2008", and then explains the causes of the event. Additionally, to do this, the author enumerates the causes, this can be seen in "Second, banks would bundle these toxic loans...".
This means the general organization of this text is to mention an event and then explain the causes of it in detail. This only occurs in the cause and effect organization because this the only one that allows authors to explore the causes and/or effects of one or more events. According to this, the structure is cause and effect.
D read what the writer already has then get my ideas from there
Answer:
According to this essay, the chain of events that are taking place is - Heat is causing death by heatstroke in young athletes and Thermometer pills are causing young athletes to be cautious. So the right chain of events would involve options B and C.
Explanation:
The essay starts addressing the issue that it is the internal heat or temperature of the body that shuts down the cooling system of the body at times causing a heat stroke and it is the young athletes who are at risk. They often don't understand the symptoms until it's too late. Then, it goes on to introduce a new product called thermometer pills which is a solution to this problem. Finally, a detail of how it works is given along with its only drawback that it is expensive. So the chain of events in this essay mainly comprises of the points mentioned under options B and C.
Answer:
B. In the absence of surprise, a witty remark loses much of its humorous effect.
Explanation:
Answer B
Correct. In the first sentence of the third paragraph, the author makes the claim that “merriment” (amusement) can be produced only by “a sudden impression,” that is, a surprise. In the second sentence of the paragraph, the author advances that claim by using the clause “which is expected” to assert that jests (witty remarks) lacking such an element of surprise (because the audience is expecting them) lose much of their humor and are thus effectively “already destroyed.”
