A scientific theory. Obviously, the hypothesis would need a considerable amount of increased testing to be proven a scientific law. But, even so, it could become a theory.
I hope this helped you!
Answer:
Tt - 2/4 = 1/2 or 50% Heterozygous TALL
tt - 2/4 = 1/2 or 50% Homozygous Dwarf
Explanation:
So let's make a Punnett for this so you can see what the outcome is yourself:
Tall is <u>dominant</u> - T
Dwarf is <u>recessive</u> - t
Heterozygous means that they have one of each allele. The genotype of one parent would be then Tt.
***It is heterozygous tall because Tall is a dominant trait so if it is accompanied by the recessive trait dwarf, then the Tall allele would mask it.
The other parent is a dwarf plant. The genotype would then be tt.
*** Now for a recessive trait to appear, it should not have a dominant trait mixed with it, which could mask it. The result then is homozygous recessive or homozygous Dwarf.
So now that we know the genotypes of the parent plants, we can put it into a Punnet:
t t
T Tt Tt
t tt tt
As you can see, out of the 4 outcomes we have:
Tt - 2/4 = 1/2 or 50% Heterozygous TALL
tt - 2/4 = 1/2 or 50% Homozygous Dwarf
Small fragments of orbiting bodies that have landed on Earth are known as meteorites. If the fragments are still orbiting earth are known as meteoroids. They are not called meteorites until they enter Earth's atmosphere. Once a meteor enters Earth's atmosphere it will begin to burn up. It may burn up completely or lose most of its size by the time is lands on Earth's surface.
I think it's the first and second option but I could be wrong because I don't know much about deserts :)
Answer: check below
Carbon dating is accurate only for objects less than 60,000 years old. Use the idea of half-life to explain this limitation. (1 point) Hint Carbon-13’s half life is 6,000 years
Explanation:
HOpe helps
:3
