(Ms)Kisha is correct.
How?
Well, I figured this out by using common sense. 8 mangoes are 10 dollars. Since the price is higher than the amount, so it has to be at least more than one.
We could write more ratios. You can always write more ratios. You just multiply/divide both sides. Examples below:
2:5
16:20
Answer: 3x^2 - 3
Step by step explanation:
Each week, a cook purchased 12 LBS. of Butter:
During the Last year: (12 Months):
Cook Paid:
Little: $23.04
Much: $29.40, For Butter he or she purchased in a week:
Question: is: what is the Difference between, the Greatest price per pound, and the least price per pound of butter the cook paid within the last year?
EQUATION:
Least Paid / 12 =====> 23.04 /12
Most Paid / 12 ======> 29.40 / 12
Divide:
23.04 / 12 = 1.92 / LB
29.40 / 12 = 2.45 / LB
Now Subtract:
2.45 - 1.92
Answer ======> 0.53 is the difference, between the greatest price per round, and least price per round of butter the cook would have paid within the last year.
Hope that helps!!! : )
Answer:
x = 4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The correct option is;
c. Because the p-value of 0.1609 is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. We conclude the data provide convincing evidence that the mean amount of juice in all the bottles filled that day does not differ from the target value of 275 milliliters.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here we have the values
μ = 275 mL
275.4
276.8
273.9
275
275.8
275.9
276.1
Sum = 1928.9
Mean (Average), = 275.5571429
Standard deviation, s = 0.921696159
We put the null hypothesis as H₀: μ₁ = μ₂
Therefore, the alternative becomes Hₐ: μ₁ ≠ μ₂
The t-test formula is as follows;
Plugging in the values, we have,
Test statistic = 1.599292
at 7 - 1 degrees of freedom and α = 0.05 = ±2.446912
Our p-value from the the test statistic = 0.1608723≈ 0.1609
Therefore since the p-value = 0.1609 > α = 0.05, we fail to reject our null hypothesis, hence the evidence suggests that the mean does not differ from 275 mL.
