1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natasha2012 [34]
3 years ago
15

Describe how the relations between the Jamestown settlers and Powhatan Indians changed over time.

History
1 answer:
mariarad [96]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The interdependence of the English and the Powhatans many times seemed one-sided when the English were in desperate need of food and that provided by the local Indians was the only thing between their survival and their demise. The Powhatans’ understanding of the environment and geography was also very important to the Jamestown settlers in mapping the region. For their part, the Powhatans, though wary of the motivations of the English, were very interested in barter, especially in acquiring guns, hatchets, lead musket balls, metal tools and European copper. In addition to the corn they needed from the Indians, the English later came to desire local animal furs, especially beaver pelts, which were then exported to England for use in felt hat production. The colonists learned that the Powhatans wanted English cloth, especially wool, because they did not have comparable materials from which to make clothing and blankets. The Powhatans were accustomed to using traditional stone, shell or bone tools, but soon found that English-made metal tools were more durable and held a sharp edge longer. The strong desire for trade on the part of both parties fueled the off-and-on relationship for years to come. The Indians and settlers understood each other’s needs and desires well enough for successful barter in small-scale items, but their ideas about land ownership and use posed more significant obstacles. The Powhatans did not interpret the concept of “selling” land in the same way as the English purchasers. When the Powhatans continued to hunt on land that the English considered their possession, conflict was a common result.

Captain John Smith had much success initially in obtaining food, farming advice, and geographical knowledge from the Powhatans. Indeed, the fact that the colony managed to survive at all was in large part due to the ability of Smith to speak and negotiate with the Indian tribes. However, by early 1609, his tactics became more aggressive and his tenure with the colony was not long, as an injury sustained in a gunpowder explosion caused him to return to England in the fall of 1609. After his departure, hostility grew between the English and the Powhatans. With the development of new settlements over the next four years, the English began pushing the Powhatans off their land, which fronted the rivers. Fighting between the groups was common, with raids on each other’s land and kidnappings. As more plantations were established along the James River after 1616, relations continued to deteriorate, with both cultures claiming use of the land.

Almost from the first interactions between the two cultures, both groups used hostages or sent intermediaries to learn one another’s languages in order to serve as interpreters. It was hoped that this would encourage “good behavior” on both sides. Nothing seemed to work for very long. The 1613 kidnapping of Pocahontas, a daughter of Wahunsonacock, her baptism as “Rebecca” and her eventual marriage to John Rolfe in 1614 are perhaps the most famous of these interactions. A period of relative calm between the English and the Powhatans did occur after these events.

After Wahunsonacock died in 1618, his brother Opechancanough became ruler. Opechancanough worked to win the trust of the settlers, entering into agreements for land and reciprocal defense, among other things. In reality, Opechancanough believed that the English had treated his people like a subjugated nation – collecting payment of tribute in corn and, in some cases, reducing them to dependence by removing them from their lands. Opechancanough was patient and waited until the time was right. In 1622, he led the first coordinated attack on several English plantations, killing more than 300 of the 1,200 colonists. Jamestown was warned and escaped destruction. This led to a decade of open warfare, culminating in a treaty in 1632. A decade of tenuous peace followed.

Prior to these attacks in 1622, the Virginia Company had dramatically increased the number of colonists sent to Virginia every year, and the population had tripled within three years, threatening Powhatan territory between the York and James Rivers. By 1622, Indians were forced to move inland away from their traditional river valley homes. The lack of communication that existed between the two groups in 1607 did not improve sufficiently to bridge cultural differences as deep and sensitive as land ownership. As a result of the treaty in 1632, the English tried to limit contact between the Indians and the colonists, including limiting trade. In 1646, after a second Indian uprising and the death of more than 400 colonists, the Powhatans suffered a final defeat and signed a formal peace treaty with the Virginia government. This treaty barred the Indians from traveling on the James-York peninsula.

You might be interested in
With popular sovereignty , what is thr source of their authority? -the subject is government btw-​
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

sovereignty means that the government can only exercise authority if it has been given permission to do so by the People. Therefore, popular sovereignty LIMITS THE POWERS OF GOVERNMENT.

Explanation:

so the citizens

4 0
3 years ago
Helpppppppppppp plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
aliina [53]

UNICEF and its partners are trying to help a generation of Rwandan children recover their lives, especially in the areas of health, counseling and education:

offering support to households headed by minors through the provision of pedagogical materials, guidance, activities for income generation and professional training

preventing the spread of HIV / AIDS through education and guidance

providing immunization, and

supporting the official education system and helping children outside the school system

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is the most valid historical documentation: Group of answer choices artifacts because these are not open
DanielleElmas [232]

Answer:

Two or more dependable sources that record the same event using the same facts is needed to establish historical accuracy.

Explanation:

Artifacts can be open to interpretation because historians need to figure out what they are & what they mean about life in the time they were made.

Although primary sources are helpful, they are not indisputable because one person cannot completely confirm an event. Consider what would happen if future historians only used a conspiracy theorist's journal to figure out what life in our current time is like.

Religious documents often record fictional events.

<u>Two or more dependable sources is the right answer because more resources mean that something is more likely to be true.</u>

4 0
2 years ago
What political system would have a "supreme leader"? A. fascism B. capitalism C. socialism D. none of the above
Bond [772]

A supreme leader typically refers to the person among a number of leaders of a state, organization or other such group who has been given or ... In politics, a supreme leader usually has a cult of personality associated with them, such as below: ... Benito Mussolini, dictator of Fascist Italy

so the answer is A) fascism

6 0
3 years ago
3 causes of the end of World War 1.
SIZIF [17.4K]

Explanation:

This'll make it easy : https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/zqhyb9q/articles/zkb86v4

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Article Five of the U.S. Constitution describes the amendment process. This power best reflects the principle of... ?
    15·1 answer
  • Whats the date Texas was independent from Mexico?
    14·2 answers
  • What does entente mean
    6·2 answers
  • What was the objective of Roosevelt's address?
    9·1 answer
  • 1 what do you mean by Government?​
    15·1 answer
  • Discuss a story inside the Hebrew or Christian canon that also appears in another religious system. Which do you think came firs
    10·2 answers
  • What is the main difference between a contact force and a non-contact force?
    6·1 answer
  • I need definitions for all of these, please!
    8·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!! PLEASE HELP
    13·2 answers
  • Decisions made by
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!