Answer:
23 maybe
Step-by-step explanation:
Jaime is incorrect, the angle does not depend on the radius of the circles.
<h3>Is Jaime correct?</h3>
Remember that an angle that defines an arc on a circle, does not depend on the radius of the circle.
So, if we have an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 3 inches and an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 6 inches, these two angles are exactly the same thing.
The radius of the circle only has an impact on the length of the arc defined by the angle.
So Jaime is clearly incorrect.
If you want to learn more about angles:
brainly.com/question/17972372
#SPJ1
Answer:
£5200
Step-by-step explanation:
First, converting R percent to r a decimal
r = R/100 = 2%/100 = 0.02 per year,
then, solving our equation
I = 5000 × 0.02 × 2 = 200
I = £ 200.00
The simple interest accumulated
on a principal of £ 5,000.00
at a rate of 2% per year
for 2 years is £ 200.00.
Answer:
50⁰
Step-by-step explanation:
Since j and k are parallel lines cut by two transversals,
2+3+5=180⁰ <em>(</em><em>Allied</em><em> </em><em>angles</em><em>)</em>
We are given 2(60⁰) and 5(70⁰)
so,
60⁰+3+70⁰=180⁰
60+70=130
130⁰+3=180⁰
Bring the 130⁰ to the R.H.S
3=180⁰-130⁰
Therefore,
3=50⁰