Answer:
Hello, Read below
Explanation:
It allows the economy's exchange rate to increase and it allows for a business to price goods according to labour and resources costs.
This scenario is related to this following source and type <u>Source - Statutory, Type – Civil</u>.
Option: B
<u>Explanation</u>:
Statutory Law is a source law which is a written law that is passed by a legislature’s body as an opposition to the oral or customary law or a regulatory law pronounced by the common law of the judiciary or the executives. It can be originated either with local municipalities or state legislatures or national legislatures.
Civil is the type of law which deals with rules body which defines and protects the private rights of the citizens of the nation. It provides legal reforms to resolve or solve any dispute. Contracts, torts, properties and family laws come under this type of law. In the above scenario there is a dispute between Alex and Reese. The property of the Alex is damaged so, Alex wanted to take Reese to court and solve this problem. If there are any disputes then civil type of law deals with it.
Answer:
a. unconditioned stimulus
Explanation:
Unconditioned stimulus: In psychology, the term "unconditioned stimulus" is described as one of the parts in the classical conditioning theory and is also denoted as UCS or US. It is defined as one of the stimuli that tend to trigger a particular response unreservedly what so ever is being presented without being trained in past and hence triggers the unconditioned response or UCR or UR.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the "unconditioned stimulus".
<h3>
Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.
In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.
In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.
Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.
A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.
