Answer:
Current assets:
Amount = 2014 value - 2013 value
= $203,600 - $254,000
= -($50,400) (Negative)
percentage changes = 
= 
= (19.84)%
Plant assets:
Amount = 2014 value - 2013 value
= $1,397,000 - $831,700
= $565,300
percentage changes = 
= 
= 67.96%
Total assets:
Amount = 2014 value - 2013 value
= $1,600,600 - $1,085,700
= $514,900
percentage changes = 
= 
= 47.42%
Answer:
Explanation:
Using the EOQ Formula = EOQ
D = Demand = 773
O = Ordering Cost =28
H = holding Cost = 11*33% =3.63
So we have :
EOQ=
EOQ= 
EOQ=
EOQ= 
EOQ= 109.20196
Previous per unit order cost = 28/773 =0.03622
No of Orders = D/o
No of Orders = 773/109.20196 =7.0786
Cost per order =109.20196*0.03622 =3.9555
Total order cost= 7.0786*3.9555=27.9998
At EOQ holding Cost is equal to Order Cost
New Order cost =27.9998
Holding Cost = 27.9998
New cost As per EOQ = 56
Previous (33+28) = 61
Net Saving = 5
The correct answer is
"A great deal often just happens by accident"
Great deals require searching and planning.
Answer:
Dr Bonds payable $50,700
Dr premium on bonds payable $4,265
Cr Cash $53,000
Cr gain on bonds retirement($50,700+$4,265-$53000) $1,965
Explanation:
The premium yet to be amortized on the bond at retirement is the carrying value minus face value i.e $54,965-$50,700=$4265
The premium on bonds payable would now be debited with $4265
The cash paid on retirement would be credited to cash account
The face value of the bonds payable of $50,700 would be debited to bonds payable in order to show that the obligation has been discharged.
Outsourcing of jobs causes product possibilities to expand as they carry out their work or company into having it outside rather than indoor or at home in a way of expanding their functions and their company to be able to make their company known and tackle different circumstances or dimensions that will greatly affect their company.