Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

8

John lives in a country where he can be arrested for saying something that hurts another persons feelings. John most likely live

s in a democracy. True or false?

1 answer:

Elanso [62]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:true

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Minh-Tam is a lawyer whose client told her he was guilty. The client is insistent on testifying, but Minh-Tam believes she will

RoseWind [281]

I believe B as they have a right to testy if they want to but the lawyer just shut him down in fear of losing the case so it could be either unethical or illegal

8 0

2 years ago

Molly Weasley bought a Great Lakes spa from Mundungus, a dealer who was selling spas at the state fair.

BartSMP [9]

1) The theory of product liability under which Weasley could have sued Mundungus to recover for Ginny's injuries is strict product liability.

However, the facts do not support such a claim because the negligence of Weasley caused Ginny's injuries. How could a child of six years be left alone in a spa?

<h3>What are the theories of product liability?</h3>

The theories of product liability, which involve injury or damage caused by a defective product, include negligence, breach of contract/warranty, and strict liability.

For strict liability to be imposed on Great Lakes, Weasley must prove that the tort occurred based on Mundungus' irresponsibility. The question is, was Mundungus responsible for caring for Ginny or her mother?

2) The Privity of contract would not be required in a product liability case against Great Lakes. Since the spa is a product of Great Lakes while Mundungus sold it to Weasley, there is no basis for Great Lakes to deny privity of contract.

<h3>What is the privity of contract?</h3>

Using privity of contract as a basis of defense means that only parties to a contract have right to sue and be sued so that they can enforce the rights and obligations arising from the contract.

3) The six requirements that Weasley must meet for action in strict product liability against Great Lakes are proving that:

The spa caused Ginny to be injured and not Weasley's negligence.
The spa that injured Ginny was defective.
The defect of the spa caused Ginny's injury.
The defect of the spa made it dangerous for Ginny.
The negligence arose from Great Lakes.
Great Lakes breached the contract warranty.

4) The defenses to product liability that Mundungus or Great Lakes can assert are as follows:

Weasley lacks the locus standi.
No duty of care was owed to Ginny by Mundungus or Great Lakes.
Weasley misused the spa through her negligence.
Weasley must know the riskiness of abandoning Ginny in the spa.

Thus, none of the theories of product liability supports Weasley's case.

Learn more about the theories of product liability at brainly.com/question/17202560

4 0

2 years ago

What check does the u.S. Senate have on the president?

Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

The United States Senate has several methods of curtailing the power of the President of the United States. This power is known as “Checks and Balances”. ”Checks and Balances” provides the ability for all three branches of the United States government the power to regulate the power of any other branch. The three branches are the Executive (President), Legislative (Congress and Senate) and the Judiciary (Federal Courts including the Supreme Court). The Senate has the power to approve any treaties that the President makes with foreign nations. The Senate also has the power to approve presidential appointments e.g., federal judges, civilian employees of the US government, ambassadors and executive cabinet members.

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?

devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

There are two types of tortious interference

Tortious interference with contract
Tortious interference with good economic advantage.

Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0

1 year ago

In Engel v. Vitale, why did the courts rule that prayer in schools was unconstitutional?

weqwewe [10]

The prayer was considered a religious activity.

6 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers