M1: 4750
2500 billion in the economy
Answer:
Yes, the company is liable because Jamal was on his work route and took a minor detour to pick shirts he needed for work.
Explanation:
Generally what determines if the company is liable or not for a car accident, is if the employee was acting within the scope of his/her normal employment activities. In this case, even though Jamal took a break to pick up some shirts for work, he didn't deviate form his normal activities and not even from his normal work route. He was actually coming back from making a delivery.
It would have been different if he had gone to a different neighborhood or downtown just to pick the shirts. You must also consider that Jamal drives the delivery truck 10 hours a day, and that doesn't leave him a lot of spare time for his own personal activities, and this particular one was also related to his work.
This situation is similar to an accident happening when a truck driver is stopping to go to the bathroom or eating something while travelling.
Answer:
d. downward and cause output to decrease
Explanation:
As we know that
Aggregate demand = Consumption expenditure + government expenditure + net export
Where,
Net export = Export - import
In the case when there is a reduction in the consumer spending so it would be expected that the aggregate demand curve would be shifted to the downward due to which it results in reduction in output
Therefore the option d is correct
The answer to this question would be: $4.66
In this question, the grapes price is $1.99 per pound and you try to buy 2.34 pounds of grapes. Then you need to multiply the price with the weight of grapes. The calculation would be:
total price= price per pound * grapes weight(in pounds)
total price= $1.99/ pound * 2.34 pounds= $4.66
Answer:
Full question: <em>On their birthdays, employees at a large company are permitted to take a 60-minute lunch break instead of the usual 30 minutes. Data were obtained from 10 randomly selected company employees on the amount of time that each actually took for lunch on his or her birthday. The company wishes to investigate whether these data provide convincing evidence that the mean time is greater than 60 minutes. Of the following, which information would NOT be expected to be a part of the process of correctly conducting a hypothesis test to investigate the question, at the 0.05 level of significance?</em>
<em>Answe</em><em>r: Since that the p-value is greater than 0.05, rejecting the null hypothesis and concluding that the mean time was not greater than 60 minutes. </em>
Explanation:
<em>From the given question let us recall the following statements:</em>
<em>Employees at a large company are permitted to take a 60-minute Lunch break instead of the 30 minutes.</em>
<em>Data was gotten from = 10 randomly selected company employees on the amount of time that each actually took for lunch on his or her birthday</em>
<em>Given that the p-value is greater than 0.05, rejecting the null hypothesis and concluding that the mean time was not greater than 60 minutes.</em>
<em>The company tries to investigate the data to know that the mean is greater than 60 minutes</em>
<em>the next step is to find the process of correctly conducting a hypothesis test to investigate the question, at the 0.05 level of significance</em>
<em>Therefore,</em>
<em>Since that the p-value is greater than 0.05, rejecting the null hypothesis and concluding that the mean time was not greater than 60 minutes. </em>
<em>Or</em>
<em>The P-value> 0.05</em>
<em>The mean time is not greater than 60 minutes</em>
