Answer:
Basic earning per share = $3.69
Explanation:
Earning per share (EPS) = earnings available to ordinary shareholders/ number of ordinary shares
Number of ordinary shares = 390,000 × 2 = 780,000 units
Net income 2,900,000
Preferred dividend <u> ( 24,000)</u>
Earnings available to shareholders <u>2,876,000</u>
Number of ordinary shares 780,000 units
Earnings per shares = $2,876,000/780,000 units
= $3.69
Answer:
Income effect
Explanation:
The effect is because the customer purchasing power has been changed due to which he is now able to buy more to fulfill his needs and wants. The income effect occurs due to two reasons.
Number 1. The real income of the person has been increased which means his purchasing power has been increased. This means previously you were earning $2000 a month and now you are earning $10000 a month. Now you can buy New Iphone every month because your real income has been increased and this has increased your purchasing power.
Number 2. The price of the product has been fallen and now it is in range of the purchasing power of the customer. This means that if Iphones 11 are available at $100 then everybody buy Iphone 11. This is because the product is in the range of purchasing power of greater number of customers.
Answer:
b. jobs that are classified as part-time are jobs that can be done in a shorter amount of time than that of a full-time job, whereas job sharing creates one full-time position out of two part-time employees
Explanation:
Based on the scenario been described, we can say that the difference between part time job and job sharing is, jobs that are classified as part-time are jobs that can be done in a shorter amount of time than that of a full-time job, whereas job sharing creates one full-time position out of two part-time employees, so option b is the correct answer. In part-time job, job are done in short period of time, whereby the employee will come and do his/her job within a short period of time and leave, while job sharing is a full time job but is been shared among full time employees to do their turns.
In my opinion, bad neighborhoods have a large amount of cell phone stores because the people in the bad neighborhood usually don't come across (or have for that matter) phones. And to see the 'cool' cellphones in person and to have the people sell it in person, the people in the bad neighborhood should want it more. And considering the modern generation we are living in right now, people like technology and want it, in the term 'humans as economical creatures', a human's want will never be satisfied, they will always want more. So, as I said, people and their families like technology, and all the cellphone sellers will come to the neighborhoods who will buy and want more, why would they sell in places where people already have cell phones, so they go to bad neighborhoods.
unless you mean 'bad' isn't 'not highly rich' then I don't know, but as a thirteen year old, I tried.
Answer:
Option (B) 5.5%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question :
Factor Risk premium
Factor 1 5%
Factor 2 3%
Beta of stock A on factor 1 = 1.4
Beta of stock A on factor 2 = 0.5
Expected return = 14%
Now,
Expected return
= Risk free rate + (Beta of factor 1 × Risk premium of factor 1) + (Beta of factor 2 × Risk premium of factor 2)
or
14% = Risk free rate + (1.4 × 5%) + (0.5 × 3%)
or
14% = Risk free rate + ( 7% + 1.5% )
or
Risk free rate = 5.5%
Hence,
Option (B) 5.5%
