1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GREYUIT [131]
4 years ago
8

Era comun que las mujeres participaran en las guerras empuñaran armas

History
1 answer:
Mademuasel [1]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

TRANSLATION:

it was common for women to take part in wars to wield weapons

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why were Americans and courage to grow their own food in victory Gardens
arsen [322]

Victory Gardens were pushed by the American government during World War II to build and foster community spirit during the time of war but even more importantly, to make the average person feel like they were involved in the war and part of the war effort.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think Martineau Was concerned with the morals of the factory owners? Did their morals, or lack there of, contradict a
Kryger [21]

Answer:

In my opinion, Martineau was concerned with the morals of the factory owners because the morals of the factory owners’ effects directly to the benefits of the people who work in the factory.

I hope this helped, this is my opinion and that is what the question was asking for your opinion in the subject.

8 0
4 years ago
What events in history have resulted from natural rights?
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

answer below!

Explanation: The 40 Principal Doctrines of the Epicureans taught that "in order to obtain protection from other men, any means for attaining this end is a natural good" (PD 6). They believed in a contractarian ethics where mortals agree to not harm or be harmed, and the rules that govern their agreements are not absolute (PD 33), but must change with circumstances (PD 37-38). The Epicurean doctrines imply that humans in their natural state enjoy personal sovereignty and that they must consent to the laws that govern them, and that this consent (and the laws) can be revisited periodically when circumstances change.[11]

The Stoics held that no one was a slave by nature; slavery was an external condition juxtaposed to the internal freedom of the soul (sui juris). Seneca the Younger wrote:

It is a mistake to imagine that slavery pervades a man's whole being; the better part of him is exempt from it: the body indeed is subjected and in the power of a master, but the mind is independent, and indeed is so free and wild, that it cannot be restrained even by this prison of the body, wherein it is confined.[12]

Of fundamental importance to the development of the idea of natural rights was the emergence of the idea of natural human equality. As the historian A.J. Carlyle notes: "There is no change in political theory so startling in its completeness as the change from the theory of Aristotle to the later philosophical view represented by Cicero and Seneca.... We think that this cannot be better exemplified than with regard to the theory of the equality of human nature."[13] Charles H. McIlwain likewise observes that "the idea of the equality of men is the profoundest contribution of the Stoics to political thought" and that "its greatest influence is in the changed conception of law that in part resulted from it."[14] Cicero argues in De Legibus that "we are born for Justice, and that right is based, not upon opinions, but upon Nature.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the colonists in the British differ in their views on making money and the use of taxes?​
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

There  were no banks and very little money, so colonists used barter and  credit to get the things they needed.

Explanation:

The colonist didn't like their view on the money and taxes. Because the taxed mostly colonist cuz of the king. The  King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the  colonies. The colonists didn't like that but the British people didn't really are cuz they believed in there king.

8 0
3 years ago
What were the states before they were independent?
Rasek [7]

Answer:

The Great War for the Empire, 1754-1763 (otherwise known as the French and Indian War, or in Britain as the Seven Years’ War) eliminated French power from North America and extended British power to all territories east of the Mississippi river.

Ironically, the completeness of the British victory set the scene for the elimination of British power from what would become the USA a mere two decades later.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A restaurant chain sells 175,000 burritos each day when it charges $7.50 per burrito. For each $0.50 increase in price, the rest
    13·1 answer
  • Which british action turned most colonial printers into revolutionaries?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the marxis theory
    13·1 answer
  • Where did General Lee sign the surrender papers?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following sectors had Hamilton's support
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these pieces of legislation was an important step in limiting slavery?
    5·2 answers
  • The Roman Republic was formed in 509 BCE after which of the following occurrences?
    5·1 answer
  • in American history what are some possibilities for our Generation and future generations to explore?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the People's Party is correct
    8·1 answer
  • Weapons and their purpose in world war 1
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!