The way that a local water budget differs from the water budget of the whole Earth is that t<span>he local water budget is not balanced and the whole Earth is balanced.
Some societies in their local communities have more water than others, meaning that at the local level, these budgets are not equal, because some budgets are higher than the other ones. However, if you take a look at the budget for the whole planet, you will see that it is pretty balanced.
</span>
Answer:
The answer is 16 years.
Explanation:
The formula for calculating the value of an investment that is compounded annually is given by:
Where:
is the number of years the investment is compounded,
is the annual interest rate,
is the principal investment.
We know the following:
And we want to clear the value <em>n</em> from the equation.
The problem can be resolved as follows.
<u>First step:</u> divide each member of the equation by 
:
<u>Second step:</u> apply logarithms to both members of the equation:
<u>Third step:</u> apply the logarithmic property 
in the second member of the equation:
Fourth step: divide both members of the equation by 
We can round up the number and conclude that it will take 16 years for $10,000 invested today in bonds that pay 6% interest compounded annually, to grow to $25,000.
Answer:
quantity demanded equals quantity supplied
Explanation:
The market equilibrium is the price at which the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied cross each other. The intersection could be made by supply and demand curves.
Therefore, there is a direct relationship between the price and the quantity supplied, while the price and quantity demanded have an inverse relationship.
When the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied are intersect at the price so we called market equilibrium
Answer:
Financial disadvantage from further processing = $(9)
Explanation:
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost. </em>
<em>Also note that all cost incurred up to the split-off point (the cost of crushing) are irrelevant to the decision to process further . </em>
$
Sales revenue after crushing 55
Sales revenue at the split-off point <u>81</u>
Additional sales revenue 26
Further processing cost <u> (35)</u>
Net income after further processing <u> (9)
</u>
Financial disadvantage from further processing = $(9)
<em>Kindly note that the allocated joint costs( cost of sugar and crushing) are irrelevant. This implies that whether or not the intermediate products are processed further the joint costs are irrelevant to the decision to process the beet juice further</em>.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Debt = D ÷ (E + D)
= 0.8 ÷ (1 + 0.8)
= 0.4444
Now
Weight of equity = 1 - Debt
= 1 - 0.4444
= 0.5556
As per Dividend discount model
Price = Dividend in 1 year ÷ (cost of equity - growth rate)
40 = $2 ÷ (Cost of equity - 0.06)
Cost of equity = 11%
Cost of debt
K = N
Let us assume the par value be $1,000
Bond Price =∑ [(Annual Coupon) ÷ (1 + YTM)^k] + Par value ÷ (1 + YTM)^N
k=1
K =25
$804 =∑ [(7 × $1000 ÷ 100)/(1 + YTM ÷ 100)^k] + $1000 ÷ (1 + YTM ÷ 100)^25
k=1
YTM = 9
After tax cost of debt = cost of debt × (1 - tax rate)
= 9 × (1 - 0.21)
= 7.11
WACC = after tax cost of debt × W(D) + cost of equity ×W(E)
= 7.11 × 0.4444 + 11 × 0.5556
= 9.27%
As we can see that the WACC is lower than the return so it should be undertake the expansion
