Describe how fraud in scientific research could affect other scientific who research I ethical ways

1 answer:

5 0

Fraud in research can affect other scientific researchers in very big ways. Fraud in scientific research by one scientist could prevent other scientists from doing accurate research on the same subjects after they take the original scientists work as legitimate and accurate. Scientists build off of each others previous work and findings, so if a scientists commits fraud or creates a false body of knowledge it can directly influence other scientists work and prevent them from doing solid, valid scientific research.

You might be interested in

The freudian stage during which girls must resolve the electra complex is the ______ stage

hoa [83]

The Freudian stage during which girls must resolve the Electra complex is the identification stage.
Electra complex is the conflict between erotic attraction, resentment, rivalry, jealousy and fear in girls. When the girl desires the father, but realizes that she does not have a penis. The same thing in boys is called Oedipus complex.

3 0

4 years ago

Tracy has an idea that is low on value and usefulness and low on degree of novelty. According to the Neck Idea Generation Matrix

madreJ [45]

Answer:

irrelevant

Explanation:

Under the neck idea generation model, Tracy's idea would be considered irrelevant as it low on all three measures: value, usefulness and novelty. If an idea is high on usefulness and value under this model however but low on novelty, it would have the quality of improvement as it is seen to have potential and can be improved upon.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following was most true about many of Rome's leaders just before the city was defeated?

Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

Correct answer is They were weak and sometimes dishonest.

Explanation:

First option is correct as the Roman Empire, especially western part was very unstable. That was additionally upheld by the fact that most of them since the division of Empire in 395 had no authority and brought many wrong decision.

Second option is not correct as we cannot say that they were popular at all.

Third option is not correct, as one of the ways how we were able to see their incompetence was through the fact that they practically made no reform.

Last option is also not correct as people weren't directly choosing them.

3 0

3 years ago

What were two major seaports in the US during colonial times

Ronch [10]

Massachusetts and North American seaports

4 0

3 years ago

Describe the experiments of van helmont, priestle, and ingenhousz. how did the work of these scientists contribute to our curren

gtnhenbr [62]

Hey there,

Answer:

Van Helmont - He concluded that trees gain most of their mass by absorbing water

Priestley- He found out that plants release oxygen

Ingenhousz- He concluded that plants needs sunlight to produce oxygen.

Hope this helps :D

~Top♥

4 0

3 years ago