Answer:
The answer is d. postconventional.
Explanation:
According to Kholberg, postconventional morality is the last stage of his moral development model. In this stage, a person has formed his own sense of morality. However, in some cases their beliefs might be different from other people's. If the person is able to act beyond their own sense of morality, it's possible to say he is at the postconventional stage.
As part of their settlement of Manhattan, the Dutch purportedly purchased the island from the Native Americans for trade goods worth 60 guilders. More than two centuries later, using then-current exchange rates, a U.S. historian calculated that amount as $24, and the number stuck in the public’s mind. Yet it’s not as if the Dutch handed over a “$20 bill and four ones,” explained Charles T. Gehring, director of the New Netherland Research Center at the New York State Library. “It’s a totally inaccurate figure.” He pointed out that the trade goods, such as iron kettles and axes, were invaluable to the Native Americans since they couldn’t produce those things themselves. Moreover, the Native Americans had a completely different concept of land ownership. As a result, they almost certainly believed they were renting out Manhattan for temporary use, not giving it away forever. Due in part to such cultural misunderstandings, the Dutch repeatedly found themselves at odds with various Native American tribes, most notably in the brutal Kieft’s War of the 1640s. “The Dutch were instructed by their authorities to be fair and honest with the Indians,” said Firth Haring Fabend, author of “New Netherland in a Nutshell.” “But you can’t say they were much better [than the other European nations colonizing the Americas.] They were all terrible.”
Good Luck!
Explanation is the correct answer.
Scientific investigation is the way researchers and scientists found to produce evidence to answer the questions about the world around us by using a systematic approach. Perceiving the question is the first step in any scientific investigation. <u>The second step is forming a hypothesis. This step is derived from two goals of psychology-description and explanation.</u>
The tendency to hold onto losing stocks in the hope that they will recoup is called loss aversion.
Loss aversion is a cognitive bias that explains why the pain of loss has twice as much psychological impact as the joy of winning. Losing money or another valuable item can feel worse than gaining the same. This principle is prominent in the field of economics. What distinguishes loss aversion from risk aversion is that the utility of monetary rewards depends on what has been previously experienced or expected.
In the realm of behavioral choice, 'loss aversion' is a behavioral phenomenon in which individuals exhibit greater sensitivity to potential losses than gains. Conversely, “risk-averse” people have an increased sensitivity/aversion to options with uncertain outcomes.
Learn more about stocks here: brainly.com/question/690070
#SPJ4
Answer:
They obviously hated the total lack of freedom and the economic deprivation that meant with being satellite states of the oppressive USSR. And by the way the USSR itself imploded the citizens of the USSR also hated the Communist tyranny and lack of economic well-being which was far behind western Europe.
In 1955 the Soviet Union and its satellites signed the Warsaw Pact. Like NATO the pact pledged each nation to defend the others in the alliance. the Soviet Union also used the pact to keep control over its satellites.
Explanation:
hope this helped
