Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
Answer:
The phenomena that best explains what Susan is experiencing is the Weber's Law.
Explanation:
The Weber's Law states that there's a quantitative relation between the magnitud of a physical stimuli and how this is perceived, this law formulated the mathematical relation that existed between the intensity of the stimuli and the sensation or the perception produced by the stimuli. So in our case when Susan changes the volume and as she perceives "Only slightly" she notices a large difference therefore stablishing a relation between the stimuli and what she perceived, this whole phenomenah could be best explaint by Weber's Law because this relation is what the law studied and explained.
Explanation:
er people have different expectations these days, and that will continue to change. What might have been good enough for previous generations will not cut it in the future, and what we have is not sustainable anyway. I certainly don’t want to end up in a care home, nor do I want to have to make the decision for my parents to go into one. I have worked with many older people who have just wanted to stay in their own homes. It’s about choice, having the services in place to support people to make choices about how they want to live, and be supported when necessary in later life.
<span>B. Maintain order and security at all times and costs, sometimes requiring placing limits to individual libertie</span>
The answer is<u> "cutting down on their own sleep and leisure time".</u>
As indicated by Russell Hill and Frank Stafford, one way moms make up for being in the paid labor force full-time is by eliminating their own particular rest and relaxation time.
Nonetheless, this expansion in time spent by youngsters in organized settings does not seem to have come to the detriment of time went through with guardians.
Parents give off an impression of being safeguarding the time that they go through with their kids by 'taxing' other exercises, including sleep.
