The journal entry for the purchase of the stock for the trading securities portfolio is that Securities account debited and bank account credited.
Given that Slick Rocks management purchased the Sandstone stock for the trading securities portfolio instead of the available-for-sale securities portfolio.
We are required to form the journal entry that are required by the facts presented in the case.
A journal is basically a detailed account which records all the financial transactions of a business to be used for the future reconciling of accounts.
The journal entry will be as under:
Securities account debited and bank account credited. If we know that which security is being purchased then we can name that securities also.
Hence the journal entry for the purchase of the stock for the trading securities portfolio is that Securities account debited and bank account credited.
Learn more about journal at brainly.com/question/14279491
#SPJ4
Its b
Explain:
The reason it’s because the government collects taxes which are considered leakages
The answer to this question is Lower
Viscosity refers to the rate of thickness on a certain substance compared to another. Unlike magma, Lava is the mixture of various liquid, crystals, and some elements such as silicon<span>, oxygen, aluminum, calcium, iron, magnesium </span>sodium<span>, potassium, phosphorus, and titanium, which makes it significantly more thicker compared to magma.</span>
Answer: The probabilities of winning a contract are

Let the Probability of C winning the contract - P(C) be 'X'
Then,
Probability of B winning the contract - P(B) will be '7X' and
Probability of A winning the contract - P(A) will be 
Since the total of all the probabilities is 1,




So,



Answer:
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
economic order quantity, EOQ= 55 units
annual demand, D=235
holding cost per one unit per year, H=40%×$11=$4.4
ordering cost, S=?
In order to calculate the ordering cost we would have to use the following formula:
EOQ=√(<u>2×D×S)</u>
(H)
Hence, S=<u>(EOQ)∧2×H</u>
2×D
S=<u>(55)∧2×4.4</u>
2×235
S=<u>13,310</u>
470
S=$28.31
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order