All categories

3 years ago

Illustrate, using examples, different government methods of intervention to deal with the

Business

1 answer:

Wewaii [24]3 years ago

4 0

Explanation:

The negative externalities such as pollution which is the most common externalities of the companies is handled by the government using the pollution taxes. By increasing the taxes for companies making pollution the product prices will increase and the demand for those products will decrease.

Landfill is also increasing over the years by manufacturing companies. Government imposes landfill taxes to these companies. So the companies try to recycle the rubbish by themselves than dumping in public property.

Plastic bag tax is another tax that is implemented on the business providing free bags for the customers. This is an additional cost to business so they use recyclable bags or paper bags.

So by imposing regulations, taxes and laws government is able to control negative externalities.

You might be interested in

How does creating and maintaining competitive advantages in a platform business like Uber’s differ from a vertical chain busines

omeli [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

It differs from those adopted by taxi companies because platform business most times embrace a monopoly approach because they take over the market. Platform business have strong network effect and multihoming cost and they don't have a taste for service, therefore there is the consideration of strong Internet based network which connects drivers to customers which is a competitive advantage. There is the e-payment platform. The organization does not mange drivers or seek patronage since they do not bearing homing cost. Their only aim is to create a connection between drivers and their customers.

8 0

3 years ago

why is government intervention often crucial when dealing with both positive and negative externalities?

Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

Because the government can use her sovereign power to both mitigate negative externalities as well as encourage positive externalities.

Explanation:

A positive externality occurs when the transaction between a producer and end user benefits a third party that did not take art in the process.

A very Good example is Education. There is a third party benefit to the society when we have more educated citizens.

A negative externality happens when the business transaction between a manufacturer and consumer affects a third party adversely. a typical example is cigarettes. When cigarettes is consumed by the end user, the smoke can affect the health of a third party that was not part of the initial transaction.

To deal with both positive and negative externalities, government intervention is very crucial.

Government encourages positive externalities like education by subsidizing the cost of attending a school. They also enact laws that make basic education compulsory.

In the case of negative externalities, Government can intervene with a ban on producing harmful goods and also set a legislation about smoking in public laces to mitigate the health complications caused by third party inhalation.

6 0

3 years ago

Find the future values of these ordinary annuities. Compounding occurs once a year. Round your answers to the nearest cent. $200

PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

Normal:

$ 3,509.7470

$ 563.7093

$ 2,000.00

Due:

$3,930.9167

$ 597.5319

$ 2,000.00

Explanation:

We solve using the formula for common annuity and annuity-due on each case:

$C \times \frac{(1+r)^{time} }{rate} = FV\\$

$C \times \frac{(1+r)^{time} }{rate}(1+rate) = FV\\$ (annuity-due)

First:

C 200.00

time 10

rate 0.12

$200 \times \frac{11+0.12)^{10} }{0.12} = FV\\$

$200 \times \frac{11+0.12)^{10} }{0.12}(1+0.12) = FV\\$

Normal: $3,509.7470

Due: $3,930.9167

Second:

$100 \times \frac{(1+0.06)^{5} }{0.06} = FV\\$

$100 \times \frac{(1+0.06)^{5} }{0.06} (1+0.06)= FV\\$

$563.7093

$597.5319

Third:

No interest so no time value of money the future value is the same as the sum of the receipts regardless of time or being paid at the beginning or ending.

1,000 + 1,000 = 2,000

4 0

3 years ago

Other things equal, the monopsonistic employer will pay a

zloy xaker [14]

Answer: The correct answer is "a. lower wage rate and hire fewer workers than will a purely competitive employer.".

Explanation: Monopsony is generated when there are many people looking for work and there are only a few employers, who can afford to offer a lower salary than they would have to offer if there was more competition for workers.

5 0

3 years ago

Bee Sting bought 400 shares of Google at $399.75 per share. Assume a commission of 2% of the purchase price. What is the total t

daser333 [38]

Given:
400 shares of Google
399.75 per share
2% commission on purchase price.

400 shares * 399.75/share = 159,900
159,900 x 1.02 = 163, 098

The total to Bee Sting is $163,098

5 0

3 years ago