Answer:
All i know is no its not illegal at all .
Explanation:
A homeowner fears the construction of a factory nearby will decrease the value of her property. this illustrates the principle of externalities.
Many people are unaware that there are tax advantages for home owners when they purchase, own, remodel and even sell their property. These advantages take the form of tax deductions, which lower your taxable income and hence lower your tax payment.
However, you might be astonished to hear that even though the house was bought with a mortgage, you still own it. As the homeowner, your name is listed on the title. The lender does not actually own your home; rather, they only have a stake in the property and the mortgage note.
According to the Federal Reserve's 2020 Survey of Consumer Finances, if you own your home, you probably have a higher value than someone who rents. The assumption that owning a home is a wise financial decision is supported by the fact that homeowners have a net worth that is more than 40 times bigger than their counterparts who rent.
Learn more about homeowners here:
brainly.com/question/23428348
#SPJ4
Answer:
$10,070
Explanation:
The true cash balance is the balance having considered the effect of the transactions that have happened but are yet to be captured in the books.
Reviewing the transactions,
- bank service charges of $50 - This will be deducted from the book balance
- Two credit memos are included in the bank statement: one for $940, which represents a collection that the bank made for Owen, and one for $60, which represents the amount of interest that Owen had earned on its interest-bearing account in June - Both will be added to the book balance
Hence the true cash balance
= $9,120 - $50 + $940 + $60
= $10,070
Answer:
$12,300
Explanation:
I will assume that Joseph invested in the fund on July 14, 2013.
We have to calculate the future value to March 15, 2014 (8 months later).
since the interest is compounded semi annually, it will earn interest on January 14, 2014.
Future value = $12,000 x (1 + 2.5%) = $12,300
since the fund is going to earn interests again on July 14, 2014, the value on march 14 is the same = $12,300
Answer:
The answer is "nothing changes because the fees would still be fixed costs."
Explanation:
When annual expenses throughout the cash payment are recovered, a long-term delivery curve of both the company will change.
When the lump sum costs are still only obtained once, the long-term supply curve shall be changed.
It is because, regardless of how it is paid, this tv license has little effect mostly on low cost but only a fixed cost. Its amount of output relies on how well the cost of the profit changes. Provided these are fixed costs, their performance doesn't matter.
