Answer:
$18.41
Explanation:
Equity value = FCF next year / (1 + cost of capital) + FCF in year 2 / (1 + cost of capital)^2 + 1 / (1 + cost of capital)^2 * [ (FCF in year 2 * exit multiple)]
= $25 million/1.12 + $29 million/1.12^2 + 1 / 1.12^2*[($29 million*17)]
= $25 million/1.12 + $29 million/1.12^2 + $493 million/1.12^2
= $25 million / 1.12 + $522 million / 1.12^2
= $438.4566327 million
The stock price = ($438.4566327 million - Debt + Cash) / Number of shares outstanding
= ($438.4566327 million - $34 million + $19 million) / 23 million shares
= $423.4566327 million / 23 million shares
= 18.4111579435
= $18.41
Answer:
d. They do not change the quantity of goods bought or sold in the legal market.
Explanation:
A price refers to the amount of money a customer or consumer buying goods and services are willing to pay for the goods and services being offered. The price of goods and services are primarily being set by the seller or service provider.
Price control can be defined as standard restrictions or regulatory conditions that are typically set and enforced by the government of a country.
This ultimately implies that, price controls are used to impose the minimum and maximum prices set by the government, which are to be charged for various goods and services in the market. This minimum price that can be charged such as minimum wage is known as price floor while the maximum price that can be charged such as rent control is known as price ceiling.
A nonbinding price ceiling can be defined as a price that do not have any effect on the price of goods or services in the market.
Hence, an accurate statement about the consequence of nonbinding price ceiling is that they do not change the quantity of goods bought or sold in the legal market.
Answer: a. Hostile takeovers are most likely to occur when a firm's stock is selling below its intrinsic value as a result of poor management.
Explanation:
A widely held belief in business is that hostile takeovers mostly occur because managers are performing abysmally.
To this end, the takeover takes place to discipline the poorly performing managers and restore the company to a better position.
It is worthy of note though that recently this view had been challenged by multiple authors but for purposes of this question, A is the correct answer.