1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
7nadin3 [17]
3 years ago
10

Please help thank you

Mathematics
1 answer:
Gemiola [76]3 years ago
5 0
Question 1:

This is a 45-45-90 right triangle. If the leg length is x, then the hypotenuse length will be x \sqrt{2}.

The leg length of this 45-45-90 right triangle is 8. Multiply that with the square root of 2. You get 8 \sqrt{2}. Thus, the last choice is your answer.

Question 2:

This triangle can be identified as a 30-60-90 right triangle.
Let's say the smallest leg as a length of x.
Then, the longer leg will have a length of x \sqrt{3}.
Also, the hypotenuse will have a length of 2x

This triangle follows this format, making it a 30-60-90 right triangle. Thus, the angles are 30, 60, and 90.

Hope this helps! :)
You might be interested in
3/7×=33 what is the answer to this math problem
valkas [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3/7x=33

multiply each side by 3/7

x=99/7

x=14.142

8 0
3 years ago
100 POINTS IF YOU ANSWER CORRECTLY Rotate these coordinates 180 around the origin and then translate 6 units to the left.
snow_tiger [21]
Original Coordinates: (-2, -8) (-6, -8) (-11, -1) (-7, -3)

A 180 degree rotation around the origin flips the signs of x and y, so you get:

(2, 8) (6, 8) (11, 1) (7, 3)

Then a translation to the left 6 units just subtracts 6 from all the x values:

(-4, 8) (0, 8) (5, 1) (1, 3)

Those are your points! Hope this helped!
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP PLEASE I ONLY HAVE SECONDS!!!!! will answer one of your question if you answer this one
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

1ST ONE BLUE ONE

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Q 4.19: To verify whether there are negative consequences of taking a new type of medicine, 3000 tests were conducted. Assume th
tiny-mole [99]

Answer:

The p-value obtained is less than the significance level at which the test was performed at, hence, we reject the null hypothesis, accept the alternative hypothesis & say that there is enough evidence to conclude that the the new medicine is potentially harmful.

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis plays the devil's advocate and usually takes the form of the opposite of the theory to be tested. It usually contains the signs =, ≤ and ≥ depending on the directions of the test.

While, the alternative hypothesis usually confirms the the theory being tested by the experimental setup. It usually contains the signs ≠, < and > depending on the directions of the test.

For this question, the null hypothesis is that the new medicine has no negative effects and the alternative hypothesis is that the new medicine is potentially harmful

Mathematically,

The null hypothesis is represented as

H₀: p = 0

The alternative hypothesis is represented as

Hₐ: p > 0

To do this test, we will use the z-distribution because although no information on the population standard deviation is known, the sample size is large enough.

So, we compute the test statistic

z = (x - μ)/σₓ

x = sample proportion = (31/3000) = 0.0103

μ = p₀ = 0

σₓ = standard error = √[p(1-p)/n]

where n = Sample size = 3000

σₓ = √[0.0103×0.9897/3000] = 0.0018462936 = 0.0018463

z = (0.0103 - 0) ÷ 0.0018463

z = 5.60

checking the tables for the p-value of this test statistic

Significance level = 1% = 0.01

The hypothesis test uses a one-tailed condition because we're testing only in one direction.

p-value (for z = 5.60, at 0.01 significance level, with a one tailed condition) = < 0.00001

The interpretation of p-values is that

When the (p-value > significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and when the (p-value < significance level), we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.

So, for this question, significance level = 0.01

p-value = < 0.00001

p-value < 0.00001 < 0.10

Hence,

p-value < significance level

This means that we reject the null hypothesis, accept the alternative hypothesis & say that there is enough evidence to conclude that the the new medicine is potentially harmful.

Hope this Helps!!!

6 0
4 years ago
Help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help hel
lesya [120]

f(x)= -2x+1 {-2,0,2,4,6}

If x=-2, then -2(-2)+1 = 5

If x=0, then -2(0)+1 = 1

If x=2, then -2(2)+1 = -3

If x=4, then -2(4)+1 = -7

If x=6, then -2(6)+1 = -11

Answer:

B {5,1,-3,-7,-11}

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Right away to compare 200 meters to 4 hours
    8·1 answer
  • What is 0.50 written as a percent
    15·1 answer
  • What is the measure of BC?
    12·1 answer
  • Suppose you adding 43 and 28 will you regroup ? Explain
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me with this question​
    15·2 answers
  • Jrian"s plane was supposed to leave at 1:25. If he arrived one hour and 52 minutes early, what time did he arrive at the airport
    13·2 answers
  • Please help mehhh Thank chuuu!! :))
    14·2 answers
  • Which of those is an example of numerical data ? A. Average speed b. Type of pet C. Favorite car d.home state
    13·1 answer
  • A set of average city temperatures in May are normally distributed with a mean of 20.66°C and a standard
    9·1 answer
  • Leila bought 4 CDs that were each the same price. Including sales tax, she paid a total of 58.80. Each CD had a tax of 0.90. Wha
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!